PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026Arthritis & Rheumatology0 citationsOpen Access

Serum Proteomic Signatures of RA Risk and Response: Analysis of the APIPPRA Trial

View Full Paper
MJMarianna JasenecovaCCCarl CoyleAMAlina Mihalovits

Key Points

  • The study aims to identify serum protein signatures linked to the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and response to abatacept treatment.
  • Analyzed 440 serum samples from 118 participants in the APIPPRA trial.
  • Sample analysis conducted using the SomaScan® 7k assay platform.
  • Examined serum proteins across different time intervals relative to RA onset and treatment allocation.
  • Identified significant changes in 80 proteins prior to RA onset, with 68 downregulated and 12 upregulated.
  • Progression to RA was linked to increased levels of acute phase reactants, specifically SAA1 and SAA2, and decreased CTLA4 levels.
  • Differences in protein levels were found between participants receiving abatacept versus placebo, regardless of RA outcome.

Abstract

Objective To identify serum protein signatures associated with progression to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and response to abatacept in at‐risk individuals. Methods A total of 440 serum samples from 118 APIPPRA study participants were selected from baseline to RA onset for 46 RA progressors or to study end for 72 participants who did not develop RA. Samples were analysed using the SomaScan® 7k assay platform. Differential expression analysis was assessed by progression to RA (three pre‐RA time intervals to RA, RA progressors versus non‐progressors, baseline to RA), and by treatment allocation (abatacept versus placebo). Risk and response signatures were identified in the full 7k panel and two pre‐specified subpanels defined as Inflammatory Mediators and Adaptive Immune Cell panel. Results We observed significant changes in 80 proteins (68 downregulated and 12 upregulated) occurring between RA onset and 6‐24 months before developing disease. Progression to RA was associated with increased levels of acute phase reactants SAA1 and SAA2 and reductions in CTLA4, when compared to non‐progressors at the end of treatment. Two upregulated proteins (CTLA4 and CD86), and seven downregulated proteins (CXCL13, FCRL4, FCER2, CCL21, LTA|LTB, FDCSP and IL22RA2) were observed in participants receiving abatacept compared to placebo regardless of RA outcome. Conclusion Protein signatures dominated by acute phase proteins define progression to RA, while changes associated with abatacept therapy highlight potential mechanisms of treatment response. Such signatures provide a better understanding of the immune landscape of the at‐risk phase opening up the possibility of new treatment modalities for RA prevention. image

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jasenecova et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1c33267fb587c655e681https://doi.org/10.1002/art.70082
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper