PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026Processes0 citationsOpen Access

Emerging Directions in Sequential Hydrothermal Liquefaction and Anaerobic Digestion: Advancing Resource Recovery from Diverse Sludge Streams

CYChun-Ming YenCHChang-Lung HanPDPo-Kai Ding

Key Points

  • The research aims to explore how hydrothermal liquefaction affects the efficiency and quality of resource recovery from different types of wastewater sludge.
  • Integrated hydrothermal liquefaction and anaerobic digestion
  • Controlled temperature and pressure conditions for HTL
  • Batch anaerobic digestion at 41 °C with varying inoculum ratios
  • Monitoring of total solids, suspended solids, chemical oxygen demand, pH, and electrical conductivity
  • Characterization of HTL-processed sludge using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
  • Municipal wastewater sludge showed a 65.3% reduction in total solids and enhanced biogas production of 156.7 mL/g VS at 80% inoculum.
  • Semiconductor packaging wastewater sludge had limited COD removal (26.6–85%) and lower biogas yields of 154.0 mL/g VS.
  • HTL significantly improved utilization of municipal sludge but indicated that semiconductor sludge needs alternative treatments.

Abstract

This study investigates the sequential integration of hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) and anaerobic digestion (AD) as a strategy for resource recovery from municipal wastewater (MW) and semiconductor packaging wastewater (SPW) sludges. The primary objective is to determine the influence of HTL pretreatment on conversion efficiencies, water quality metrics, and subsequent anaerobic biodegradability. Specifically, the research focuses on biogas generation, COD removal, and the potential to promote circular resource utilization. HTL was conducted under controlled temperature (150–374 °C) and pressure (10–25 MPa) conditions, followed by batch AD at 41 °C using hydrogen- and methane-producing inocula at various ratios, specifically 20%, 50%, and 80%. Key variables, including total solids (TS), suspended solids (SS), chemical oxygen demand (COD), pH, and electrical conductivity (EC), were monitored to assess degradation efficiency and resource recovery. Additionally, chemical modifications in HTL-processed sludge were characterized using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). Results indicate that MW sludge achieved significant reductions in TS (65.3%) and enhanced biogas production of 156.7 mL/g VS at 80% inoculum. These figures reflect high biodegradability and compatibility with AD. In contrast, SPW sludge demonstrated limited COD removal (26.6–85%) and lower biogas yields of 154.0 mL/g VS. These results are likely due to elevated salinity and compositional complexity. These findings suggest that while HTL pretreatment significantly improves MW sludge utilization, SPW sludge may require additional or alternative treatment strategies. Overall, this study clarifies key factors influencing the performance of integrated HTL-AD systems across distinct sludge types and lays a foundation for the further development of sustainable sludge management processes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1c33267fb587c655e6a5https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14040590
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper