PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026Veterinary Surgery0 citationsOpen Access

Subsidence of the BFX standard stem after canine total hip replacement: A case series of 177 consecutive procedures

View Full Paper
DLDaniel LowRTRhys TreharneSRScott Rutherford

Key Points

  • To describe the postoperative subsidence observed in dogs after total hip replacement using the BFX standard stem.
  • Collected clinical and radiographic follow-up data between 12 weeks and six months postoperatively.
  • Calculated subsidence using a proportion correction between immediate postoperative and follow-up radiographs.
  • Measured canal flare index, coronal and sagittal canal fill, and stem orientation.
  • Identified 24/177 (13.6%) intra- and postoperative complications, with 11/177 (6.2%) being stem complications.
  • Noted a significant association between subsidence and stem complications (p = .005).
  • Found that only 1/7 stems with over 5.0 mm of subsidence had a stem complication.
  • Observed that 3/26 stems with over 3.0 mm of subsidence had a stem complication.

Abstract

Abstract Objective To describe postoperative subsidence observed after total hip replacement (THR) with the BFX standard stem. Study design Retrospective case series. Sample population A total of 177 THR procedures in 145 dogs. Methods Clinical and radiographic follow‐up data were collected between 12 weeks and six months postoperatively. A proportion correction was used to calculate subsidence between immediate postoperative and follow‐up radiographs. Canal flare index, coronal canal fill, sagittal canal fill, coronal stem orientation and sagittal stem orientation were measured. Results There were 24/177 (13.6%) intra‐ and postoperative complications. Of these, 11/177 (6.2%) were stem complications. Eight stem complications were intraoperative femoral fissures; one fissure progressed to postoperative femoral fracture. Subsidence was associated with stem complications ( p = .005) and was not associated with non‐stem complications ( p = .76) or prosthetic luxation ( p = .07). There were seven stems with more than 5.0 mm of subsidence; of these only 1/7 had a stem complication. There were 26 stems with more than 3.0 mm of subsidence; of these only 3/26 had a stem complication. There was no association between any femoral or stem measurements and subsidence. Conclusion Subsidence of the BFX standard stem was associated with stem complications, which were mostly intraoperative femoral fissures. Thresholds of 3.0 and 5.0 mm were poorly predictive of complications, and substantial subsidence was often clinically inconsequential. Clinical significance Cutoffs for excessive subsidence may have limited clinical utility. The significance of postoperative subsidence should be interpreted in the context of other clinical findings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Low et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1c33267fb587c655e6a7https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.70084
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper