PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics0 citationsOpen Access

Modernising Coeliac Disease Dietitian Follow‐Up: Engagement and Functionality of a Digital Annual Review

View Full Paper
OAOctavia AbbottCCCristian Costas-BatlleYJYvonne Jeanes

Key Points

  • The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a digital virtual annual review tool for clinically stable adults with coeliac disease.
  • Single-centre retrospective study from September 2022 to March 2024
  • Adults diagnosed with coeliac disease for over three years participated
  • Engagement with the digital tool was measured using chi-squared analysis
  • Clinician triage time and outcomes were recorded and analyzed.
  • 81.7% of service users engaged with the digital annual review tool
  • The average triage time for clinicians was 14 minutes per review
  • 72.4% did not require interim follow-up before their annual review
  • 55% preferred using the digital tool for future reviews

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction UK guidance recommends adults living with coeliac disease (CD) receive annual care from a dietitian. However, many CD provisions have difficulties meeting these demands. The study aimed to evaluate a digital virtual annual review (VAR) tool as an alternative method of reviewing clinically stable adults with CD annually. Methods This single‐centre retrospective study analysed data between September 2022 and March 2024. Adults living with CD, diagnosed for > 3 years and deemed clinically stable by a specialist CD dietitian, received a link to complete the digital VAR tool. Chi‐squared analysis assessed the relationship between demographics and engagement with the tool. Median value indicated clinician triage time. Outcomes of the triage process were presented as frequency and percentages. Ethical approval was obtained from local higher education institute, and information governance approval was received through local processes. Results The majority (81.7%, n = 165) of service users engaged with the digital VAR tool. The demographics did not influence engagement. The specialist CD dietitian required 14 min on average to triage a singular digital VAR tool. Following triage, 72.4% ( n = 102) did not require interim input prior to their routine annual review. Only 22% ( n = 31) were deemed to require a follow‐up clinic appointment with the specialist CD dietitian to discuss symptoms or GF dietary adherence. Service users mainly preferred the digital VAR tool for future reviews (55%, n = 78). Conclusions Our study provides supportive evidence for the effectiveness of a digital annual review tool to improve the efficiency of dietetic service provision for stable adults living with CD.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abbott et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1c33267fb587c655e833https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.70213
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper