PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026Surgical Innovation0 citations

Biodegradable Stents in Benign Biliary and Pancreatic Disease: A Systematic Review

View Full Paper
DPDimitra PeristeriHFHarriet FransisRVRavi Vissapragada

Key Points

  • This review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of biodegradable stents in benign biliary and pancreatic diseases.
  • Conducted a systematic search of multiple medical databases.
  • Included studies with human data on biodegradable stent use.
  • Evaluated outcomes such as technical and clinical success, complications, and reintervention rates.
  • Total of 15 studies involving 467 patients were analyzed.
  • Technical success rate was found to be 99.4%, while clinical success was 73.3%.
  • The mean reintervention rate was 35.5%, often planned after stent degradation.

Abstract

Background Benign biliary and pancreatic diseases, including postoperative strictures, bile leaks, and chronic pancreatitis, often require temporary ductal decompression with plastic or metal stents, which may necessitate repeat interventions due to occlusion, migration, or removal. Biodegradable stents (BDSs) have emerged as an alternative, providing temporary support with spontaneous degradation and avoiding retrieval. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to May 22, 2025, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies reported human data on BDS use for benign biliary or pancreatic disease. Outcomes included technical and clinical success, dwell time, complications, and reintervention. Results Fifteen studies (467 patients) were included. The most frequent indication was benign biliary stricture, followed by post-cholecystectomy bile leaks and pancreatic duct strictures. Stents were placed via ERCP ( n = 193) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography ( n = 274). Polydioxanone-based devices were most common, with diameters 2-12 mm and lengths 30-125 mm. Technical success was 99.4% and clinical success 73.3%. Across studies, 108 complications were reported, most often cholangitis ( n = 36), stricture recurrence ( n = 19), haemobilia/bleeding ( n = 16), and pain/fever ( n = 11); migration and pancreatitis were less frequent. The mean reintervention rate was 35.5% (range 0-100%), largely reflecting planned management after stent degradation rather than device failure. Mean follow-up was 14.4 months (range 0.5-52). Conclusions BDSs appear safe and effective in selected benign biliary and pancreatic conditions. Further prospective studies and randomized trials are needed to establish optimal indications and long-term outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Peristeri et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1c46267fb587c655e847https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506261424134
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Bioresorbable biliary stents: A step forward2025 · 3 citations
  2. 2The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews2021 · 103,986 citations
  3. 3Endoscopic biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents, and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline – Updated October 20172018 · 793 citations
  4. 4Percutaneous biodegradable stent insertion for a benign biliary stricture complicating choledochojejunostomy2015 · 6 citations
  5. 5Endoscopic Management of Benign Bile Duct Strictures2013 · 44 citations