PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026Nursing Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Implementation and Evaluation of the RECAP Framework: A Quality Improvement Initiative

View Full Paper
CBCourtenay R. BruceNZNatalie Zuniga-GeorgyNWNathan Way

Key Points

  • The aim was to implement a discussion-based course to enhance nursing staff's ability to narrate care and evaluate subsequent changes in performance and patient experience.
  • Mixed-methods design with pre- and post-implementation evaluations across seven hospitals.
  • Quantitative data analyzed included HCAHPS scores and structured observations of nurse–patient interactions.
  • Qualitative data collected through free-text evaluations were thematically analyzed.
  • 95% of 4185 staff reported increased knowledge and rated the course highly.
  • Significant improvements in HCAHPS scores in five domains: care transitions, cleanliness, medication communication, discharge communication, and restfulness.
  • 1281 practice observations showed frequent use of NOC-aligned behaviors and highlighted areas for further improvement.

Abstract

Background: Narration of care (NOC) refers to a nurse’s ability to explain the purposes, goals, and objectives of nursing tasks. In this project, narration of care (NOC) refers to real-time verbal explanation of nursing tasks and should not be confused with the Nursing Outcomes Classification, which uses the same acronym. Although NOC is recognized as a critical skill, little research exists on how to teach it or evaluate its use. A companion article describes the development of a NOC framework. This article focuses on implementation and observed changes during rollout. Objective: We aimed to describe the implementation of a discussion-based course designed to teach nurses and patient care assistants (PCAs)—collectively referred to as nursing staff—how to effectively narrate care, and to assess changes observed during the implementation period. Methods: We used a mixed-methods, pre- and post-implementation design across seven hospitals over six months (February–August 2023). Quantitative data included pre–post comparisons of Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores (baseline: 2022; follow-up: 2024) and structured observations of nurse–patient interactions. Qualitative data from free-text course evaluations were thematically analyzed to contextualize quantitative findings. Integration occurred by comparing themes with observed practice gaps and patient experience trends. Results: Course Evaluations: In total, 7341 staff completed the course; 4185 evaluations were submitted. Ninety-five percent reported increased knowledge and rated the course highly. Common strategies cited included teach-back, reducing anxiety through NOC, active listening, and building personal connections. HCAHPS Comparisons: Five domains improved significantly post-implementation: care transitions (4.6, p = 0.001), cleanliness (3.9, p = 0.024), communication about medications (2.3, p = 0.042), discharge communication (2.7, p = 0.002), and restfulness (2.5, p = 0.015). Practice Observations: In total, 1281 observations were conducted. Observations indicated frequent use of several NOC-aligned behaviors and opportunities to improve narration of the environment and resolution of patient concerns. Conclusions: Improvements in patient experience measures and observed practices coincided with the course rollout. However, given the pre–post, uncontrolled design, causality cannot be inferred.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bruce et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1ca1267fb587c655f34ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep16020056
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper