PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development0 citationsOpen Access

ESG reporting in the GCC: what is the added value of the family business? Contributions from the socioemotional wealth model

View Full Paper
KNKhalil NimerNANaser M. AbuGhazalehABAhmed Bani‐Mustafa

Key Points

  • The research explores the relationship between family control and ESG disclosure in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) firms, using the Socioemotional Wealth model.
  • Analyzed a balanced panel of listed firms from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the UAE from 2016 to 2021.
  • Utilized a Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Model to assess firm-level governance effects.
  • Incorporated year-fixed effects as robustness checks to account for temporal shocks.
  • Found a positive relationship between family control and ESG disclosure, supporting reputation-building through socioemotional wealth.
  • Observed that board size amplifies this relationship, whereas female directorship dampens it, suggesting tokenism.
  • Noted that firm age positively moderates the connection, indicating mature firms leverage historical social capital for better transparency.

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates family control and ESG disclosure in the GCC. We challenge Western agency assumptions by examining how internal governance and firm maturity condition this link, testing the Socioemotional Wealth (SEW) model in a patriarchal context. Design/methodology/approach We utilize a balanced panel of listed firms from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the UAE covering the period 2016–2021. To isolate firm-level governance effects from macroeconomic volatility, we employ a Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Model (GLMM). Robustness checks explicitly incorporate year-fixed effects to control for temporal shocks and ensure the validity of the results. Findings Results reveal a positive baseline relationship between family control and ESG disclosure, supporting SEW “reputation-building”. This link is amplified by board size but dampened by female directorship, suggesting “tokenism”. Furthermore, firm age positively moderates this association, suggesting mature conglomerates leverage historical social capital to enhance transparency. Originality/value This research makes a threefold contribution: (1) it identifies the “Legitimacy Inertia” phenomenon in mature family firms; (2) it provides empirical evidence of the “Tokenism” trap in GCC board diversity and (3) it validates the dynamic nature of SEW, showing it is not a static trait but evolves with the firm’s lifecycle.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nimer et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1ca1267fb587c655f35dhttps://doi.org/10.1108/jbsed-10-2025-0437
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Corporate Social Responsibility in Canadian Family Businesses: A Socioemotional Wealth Perspective2024 · 6 citations
  2. 2ESG Reporting and Analysts’ Recommendations in GCC: The Moderation Role of Royal Family Directors2021 · 57 citations
  3. 3Nonprimogeniture succession and innovation investment in family businesses2025 · 2 citations
  4. 4Green Governance: Boards of Directors’ Composition and Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility2011 · 1,225 citations
  5. 5Do corporate policies follow a life-cycle?2016 · 229 citations