Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) remains the most common binder used in construction and accounts for nearly 7%‐8% of the world’s CO 2 emissions due to calcination of limestone and high energy use during clinker production. Reducing OPC content using SCMs is one of the major strategies to achieve sustainable construction. Stone‐cutting dust, coming from quarrying activities and having a very fine particle size with oxide composition, has come out recently as a prospective SCM. Its chemical and mineralogical composition may vary widely depending on the type of parent rock: granite and basalt dusts, rich in silica and alumina, in contrast with marble and limestone dusts, which are mainly composed of crystalline calcium carbonate with low pozzolanic activity. This review aims to compile and discuss the published works concerning the use of SCD as a partial replacement of OPC, providing detailed information about its physicochemical, mechanical, and durability performance. Studies showed that 10%–25% replacement of OPC with SCD results in improvement in compressive strength (10%–20%), reduction of water absorption, and refinement of the pore structure due to the filler effect and limited pozzolanic reactivity. However, the obtained results are still inconsistent because of varying stone type, mix design, and curing conditions. Moreover, some reports show losses of strength or reduced workability when higher replacement levels were applied or in the case of using SCD enriched in carbonates. SEM, XRD, and FTIR studies demonstrated microstructural densification and secondary C–S–H in silica‐rich systems, while calorimetric and long‐term durability studies remain limited. Overall, SCD has the potential to be a promising sustainable supplementary cementitious material; however, its performance is strongly dependent on mineralogy and processing conditions. It is recommended that a standardized testing framework should be developed in order to allow better comparability between the various published studies and to guide safe and effective application in low‐carbon cementitious systems.
Paul et al. (Thu,) studied this question.