PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry1 citationsOpen Access

A Broad Mixture of Linear and Branched Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Hay: Results of an Interlaboratory Comparison

View Full Paper
AJAnne JahnkeFederal Institute for Risk AssessmentKSKonstantin SimonFederal Institute for Risk AssessmentCGCaroline Goedecke-RöberFederal Institute for Risk Assessment

Key Points

  • This research aims to quantify PFAS in hay and assess the reliability of measurements across different laboratories.
  • Conducted an interlaboratory comparison involving nine laboratories.
  • Analyzed hay from a highly contaminated field in Germany for PFAS content.
  • Three laboratories focused on quantifying branched PFAS isomers.
  • PFAS were found in high concentrations, with levels reaching up to 148 μg/kg dry weight.
  • Branched PFAS contributed significantly, accounting for 31% of total PFAS detected.
  • 93% of laboratory results were within acceptable limits for accuracy.

Abstract

Poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a class of compounds with significant economic impact and various applications since the 1950s. Many PFAS accumulate in the environment and pose a threat to consumers through their transfer along the food chain, and are, therefore, classified as persistent organic pollutants. In this interlaboratory comparison, nine laboratories analyzed hay, grown on a highly contaminated field in Germany, for its PFAS content. In addition, three of these nine laboratories quantified branched PFAS isomers individually. The results show that PFAS are present in high concentrations (up to 148 μg/kg based on 88% dry weight; dw), with a considerable contribution (31%) of branched PFAS in the hay. The study also highlights challenges in the quantification of branched PFAS due to the lack of commercially available standard solutions. The performance of the participating laboratories was excellent, with 93% of the results falling in a z-score range within the acceptable limits of |±2|.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jahnke et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6d445be6419ac0d52326https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5c09362
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper