PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Acta Analytica0 citationsOpen Access

The Right to Forgiveness

SRSam Ridge

Key Points

  • The central aim is to challenge the widely held belief that wrongdoers cannot have a right to be forgiven.
  • Analyzed literature on forgiveness and rights.
  • Presented a counterexample where promises create a right to forgiveness.
  • Explored potential grounds for forgiveness beyond promises.
  • Addressed objections to the proposed view of forgiveness.
  • Demonstrated that some wrongdoers may indeed possess a right to forgiveness.
  • Highlighted the importance of promised forgiveness as a valid ground for such rights.
  • Engaged with counterarguments, reinforcing the need for a nuanced understanding of forgiveness.

Abstract

Abstract An almost universally held view in the literature on forgiveness is that wrongdoers cannot have a right to be forgiven. I argue this claim is false. Sometimes wrongdoers have a right to be forgiven. In Section 2, I show how widespread the view is that wrongdoers never have a right to be forgiven. In Section 3, I present a counterexample to this widely held view, arguing that promises can ground rights to be forgiven. In Section 4, I show how the case of promised forgiveness is instructive, as it points to other possible grounds for a right to forgiveness. In Section 5, I consider three objections to my view. Section 6 concludes by considering how the existence of a right to forgiveness informs debates about what forgiveness is, arguing that it gives us reason to prefer certain kinds of views of forgiveness over others.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sam Ridge (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6d8c5be6419ac0d528a2https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-026-00676-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper