PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Chemosensors0 citationsOpen Access

Green Strategies and Decision Tools for Sustainability Assessment of Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Sensors: Review

MCMarco CostaSMSabrina Di MasiGBGiuseppe Egidio De Benedetto

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate current strategies for making molecularly imprinted polymer sensors more environmentally sustainable.
  • Survey of strategies for sustainability in MIP sensor design and lifecycle
  • Analysis of material selection, fabrication, and disposal techniques
  • Consideration of bioderived components and low-impact methods
  • Application of Lifecycle Assessment (LCA) and AGREE metrics
  • Improved sustainability can be achieved through careful material and method selection
  • Bioderived and low-energy methods show promise but come with trade-offs
  • Quantitative assessments using LCA reveal significant environmental impact reductions
  • Guidelines proposed for better transitioning MIP sensors to real-world application

Abstract

Integrating environmental sustainability into chemical sensor research is no longer optional and must be addressed at the laboratory scale, where material selection, fabrication strategies, and end-of-life management are defined. Although chemical sensors benefit from miniaturization and disposable architectures, their environmental footprint extends beyond the device geometry to include the electrode substrates, functional coatings and auxiliary materials. In this context, sensors based on molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), which are entirely synthetic and artificially engineered materials, pose specific sustainability challenges related to material choice, processing, regeneration and disposal. Addressing these aspects in a systematic and quantitative manner is therefore essential to aligning high analytical performance with sustainable sensor design. This review surveys and critically discusses the strategies currently adopted to improve the environmental sustainability of MIP-based sensors, covering key stages of the MIP sensor lifecycle, including monomer and crosslinker selection, fabrication routes, operational aspects, and end-of-life management. Representative approaches such as the use of bioderived polymerization components, low-impact solvents, cleaner analyte removal methods, and low-energy polymerization techniques are analyzed, highlighting their advantages, limitations, and cost-related trade-offs. To move beyond the qualitative assessment of greenness, sustainability is addressed through Lifecycle Assessment (LCA) and AGREE-based metrics, highlighting the importance of functional units, use phase inventories, and regeneration strategies in reducing overall environmental impacts. The review concludes by proposing actionable guidelines to support the transition of MIP-based sensors from sustainable laboratory fabrication to real-world environmental monitoring applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Costa et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6df45be6419ac0d53417https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors14020049
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper