PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Journal of Integrative Plant Biology0 citationsOpen Access

A viral strategy to hijack the miR156–SPL–ICS1 module suppresses salicylic acid‐based immunity in rice

View Full Paper
BZBaogang ZhangJZJing ZouBMBaining Ma

Key Points

  • The aim is to understand how RGSV affects the miR156–SPL–ICS1 module to weaken salicylic acid-mediated immunity in rice.
  • Analyzed RGSV infection effects on miR156 and associated proteins.
  • Conducted genetic analyses on SPL14 and SPL17 functions.
  • Examined the transcriptional and post-transcriptional interactions of viral effector P3 with SPL proteins.
  • RGSV activates miR156 by binding to its promoter, leading to increased miR156 levels.
  • This increase represses SPL14 and SPL17, reducing their protein levels.
  • Loss of SPL14/17 function decreases salicylic acid accumulation and antiviral defense, whereas overexpression alleviates RGSV symptoms.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Plant viruses frequently reprogram conserved growth‐defense regulatory hubs to promote infection. Here, we show that the rice grassy stunt virus (RGSV) suppresses salicylic acid (SA)‐mediated antiviral immunity by targeting the miR156–SPL–ICS1 module. The viral effector P3 directly binds a conserved 12‐bp cis‐element in the miR156a promoter, activating its transcription and increasing miR156 accumulation. Increased miR156 represses SPL14 and SPL17 transcripts, while RGSV infection is also associated with a pronounced reduction in SPL14/17 protein abundance. P3 physically associates with SPL14 and SPL17, indicating an additional post‐transcriptional layer contributing to SPL attenuation. Genetic analyses demonstrate that SPL14 and SPL17 positively regulate ICS1 , a key enzyme in SA biosynthesis, and that loss of SPL14/17 function compromises SA accumulation and antiviral defense. Conversely, overexpression of SPL14 or SPL17 mitigates RGSV symptoms and restricts viral accumulation, whereas exogenous SA restores immunity and partially rescues disease‐associated architectural defects. Together, our findings reveal a dual‐layer virulence strategy in which RGSV P3 coordinately suppresses the miR156–SPL14/17–ICS1 pathway at transcriptional and post‐transcriptional levels, uncovering a central regulatory node that links rice development and antiviral immunity and providing actionable targets for engineering RGSV‐resistant rice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6e1a5be6419ac0d538f3https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.70174
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Molecular Interactions of a Soluble Gibberellin Receptor, GID1, with a Rice DELLA Protein, SLR1, and Gibberellin2007 · 458 citations
  2. 2Altered accumulation of osa-miR171b contributes to rice stripe virus infection by regulating disease symptoms2017 · 85 citations
  3. 3Identification of microRNA-like RNAs in a plant pathogenic fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum by high-throughput sequencing2012 · 118 citations
  4. 4Nicotiana benthamiana : Its History and Future as a Model for Plant–Pathogen Interactions2008 · 687 citations
  5. 5Rice Ragged Stunt Virus Propagation and Infection on Rice Plants2018 · 16 citations