PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology0 citationsOpen Access

Teprotumumab for Thyroid Eye Disease: Efficacy and Impact on Orbital Decompression Utilization

View Full Paper
NKNitish KumarPGPedro Lança GomesGJGaurav Jategaonkar

Key Points

  • To assess how teprotumumab therapy affects the need for orbital decompression surgery and related outcomes in patients with thyroid eye disease.
  • Identified TED patients treated before and after teprotumumab FDA approval using electronic health records.
  • Analyzed utilization trends and rates of significant exophthalmos reduction and diplopia.
  • Compared immediate and long-term follow-up outcomes between teprotumumab and orbital decompression treatments.
  • In the pre-teprotumumab group, 36.8% underwent orbital decompression; this dropped to 11.1% post-approval.
  • Immediate significant exophthalmos reduction was 94.4% for orbital decompression compared to 83.8% for teprotumumab.
  • Long-term significant exophthalmos reduction was sustained in 85.4% of orbital decompression patients versus 62.9% for teprotumumab.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives We evaluated the impact of teprotumumab therapy ( TT ) introduction on orbital decompression ( OD ) utilization for thyroid eye disease ( TED ) and compared rates of significant exophthalmos reduction ( SER ) and diplopia between TT and OD . Methods Newly diagnosed TED patients treated pre (2015–2020) and post teprotumumab (2020–2025) FDA approval were identified from the EHR . Utilization trends, diplopia rates, and immediate (≤ 6 weeks post‐intervention) and long‐term follow‐up SER (≥ 2 mm reduction) were studied. Results Of 406 TED patients, 53 (36.8%) underwent OD in the pre‐ TT cohort ( n = 144). Post‐teprotumumab approval ( n = 262), primary OD was performed in 29 (11.1%), of which 3 (10.3%) were subsequently placed on TT ; primary TT was used in 68/262 (25.9%) with subsequent OD performed in 9 (13.2%). The remaining patients used other treatments (corticosteroids, orbital radiation, rituximab, tocilizumab, etc.). In the overall cohort, immediate SER was achieved in 94.4% of OD versus 83.8% of TT patients ( p = 0.028), with greater median reduction in the OD group (5 vs. 4 mm; p = 0.001). At long‐term follow‐up (median 13 vs. 12 months), SER was sustained in 85.4% of OD and 62.9% of TT patients ( p = 0.042). Pre‐therapy diplopia was more prevalent in TT vs. OD patients (79.4% vs. 59.7%; p = 0.019). New‐onset posttreatment diplopia was higher in the OD group (20.7% vs. 5.9%; p = 0.008). Conclusions Rates of OD surgery declined following FDA approval of teprotumumab. OD achieved sustained and greater exophthalmos reduction but carried a higher risk of diplopia. Contemporaneous OD indications may have evolved to use in TT‐recalcitrant TED or those in need of urgent decompression. Level of Evidence 4.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kumar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6e2a5be6419ac0d539f8https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.70351
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper