PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Green, Green Grass of Home: A GIS-Based Analysis of Greenspace Accessibility in Quezon City

View Full Paper
CSCarl Jason B. StreeganABA. C. BlancoJMJommer Medina

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to assess greenspace accessibility in Quezon City to identify environmental inequities.
  • Utilized GIS-based network analysis with modified Accessible Natural Greenspace Standard (ANGSt)
  • Integrated data from OpenStreetMap, Project MapABLE, and QCPDAD for access point creation
  • Defined service area isochrones of varying distances to measure accessibility
  • Analyzed barangay-level access to greenspace types to identify deficits
  • Type 1 greenspaces are present in 51 barangays, Type 2 in 43, and Type 3 in only 19
  • 25 barangays lack access to Type 1, 56 to Type 2, and 90 to Type 3 greenspaces
  • Several barangays show an inadequacy of greenspaces per person, highlighting disparities

Abstract

Abstract. Urban greenspace provision in Quezon City is uneven, producing environmental inequities despite the existence of relatively large green areas. Using a GIS-based network analysis aligned with a modified Accessible Natural Greenspace Standard (ANGSt), this study quantifies barangay-level accessibility to three greenspace types according to size < 2 hectare greenspaces (Type 1 Greenspace), 2 ≤ X < 20 hectare greenspaces (Type 2 Greenspace) and ≥ 20 hectare greenspaces (Type 3 Greenspace). OpenStreetMap land use and roads, Project MapABLE tree cover, QCPDAD park points, and NAMRIA boundaries were integrated to create access points (160 meter spacings for open greenspaces or designated entrances) and service area isochrones (560 m, 750 m, 2,000 m) in QGIS 3.32 and intersect service areas with barangay polygons to identify deficits. Results show Type 1 greenspaces appear in 51 barangays, Type 2 in 43, and Type 3 in only 19. Conversely, 25, 56, and 90 barangays lack access to Type 1, Type 2, and Type 3 greenspaces, respectively. Another key revelation is the inadequacy of greenspaces per person in several barangays, indicating potential disparities in greenspace provisions. These nuanced findings emphasize the need for targeted urban planning strategies to address disparities and ensure a more equitable and sustainable greenspace environment, considering both the prevalence and accessibility of different greenspace types within the urban landscape.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Streegan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6e7b5be6419ac0d5432dhttps://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-5-w4-2025-229-2026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper