PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Latin American Politics and Society0 citationsOpen Access

“Trust in Government” in Hot Water: Obstacles to Effective Disaster Relief and Climate Adaptation Policy in Guatemala

TETodd A. EisenstadtTMTofigh MaboudiLFLudovico Feoli

Key Points

  • The research aims to analyze how national government adaptation policies affect citizens' trust in the context of climate disasters.
  • Conducted a 2023 national survey with oversampling of respondents from flood and drought zones.
  • Examined citizens' views on government adaptation performance after experiencing climate impacts.
  • Parsed differences in attitudes towards government responses to floods versus droughts.
  • Flood zone respondents express more distrust in government compared to those affected by droughts.
  • Individuals reporting firsthand climate impacts from floods demonstrate a more negative perspective on adaptation policies.
  • Respondents affected by drought more readily disconnect climate change attribution from their experiences.

Abstract

Abstract While climate adaptation has been widely viewed as a local problem, more national government strategies are also needed to achieve more favorable policies. We seek to direct attention to the impacts of national government adaptation policies on attitudes of vulnerable citizens. Specifically, we argue that responses to different forms of climate disaster, such as flooding (as opposed to drought), can more readily reduce citizens’ trust in government. Examining extreme weather victim views in Guatemala, one of the world’s most vulnerable nations, we consider differences in the impacts of flood-related extreme weather and drought-related extreme weather. Using a 2023 national survey with flood and drought over-samples, we show that flood zone respondents, especially those reporting firsthand climate impacts, have a more negative view of government adaptation performance than those suffering “slow harms” droughts which respondents did not as readily attribute to climate change.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Eisenstadt et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6e7b5be6419ac0d54355https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2025.10040
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Outsourcing the Fight against Corruption: Lessons from the International Commission against Impunity in Guatemala2017 · 27 citations
  2. 2Reversing climate leadership: an ethnographic account of the European Union’s U-turn on loss and damage at COP 27 in Sharm el-Sheikh2024 · 3 citations
  3. 3The nexus approach to water–energy–food security: an option for adaptation to climate change2015 · 660 citations
  4. 4A Perfect Moral Storm2011 · 787 citations
  5. 5Do institutions for collective action evolve?2013 · 219 citations