PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Atmosphere0 citationsOpen Access

Study on Cooperative Game and Cost Sharing of PM2.5 Reduction in Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei

View Full Paper
XSXianhong SuYLYunyan LiDPDi Peng

Key Points

  • This research aims to analyze the effectiveness of cooperative cost-sharing mechanisms for PM2.5 reduction in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region.
  • Developed an analytical framework integrating cost accounting and emission reduction scenarios.
  • Analyzed cooperative game-based cost allocation among the three regions.
  • Quantified total cost-saving potential and distributional effects of coordinated control.
  • Coordinated governance reduced PM2.5 control costs from CNY 22.627 billion to CNY 21.647 billion.
  • Final emission burdens were significantly lower for all regions post-cooperation.
  • Hebei required a larger share of emission reductions compared to Beijing and Tianjin for optimal outcomes.

Abstract

The Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) region is one of the most complex and heterogeneous regions in China, where differences in marginal abatement costs across cities jointly shape the effectiveness of regional air quality management. This study develops an integrated analytical framework that combines pollutant-specific abatement cost accounting, optimization of territorial and coordinated emission reduction scenarios, and cooperative game-based cost allocation. Using this framework, we quantify both the total cost-saving potential and the distributional effects of coordinated air pollution control in the BTH region. The results are as follows: (1) Under the territorial governance model, the total cost reaches CNY 22.627 billion, whereas coordinated governance lowers this to CNY 21.647 billion. Joint prevention and control is economically more efficient and produces a globally optimal cost outcome for the region. (2) After redistribution, the final burdens of Beijing (CNY 572 million), Tianjin (CNY 1.154 billion), and Hebei (CNY 19.921 billion) are all lower than their territorial governance costs, ensuring that each region gains from cooperation. (3) Significant differences in marginal removal costs among the three regions, with Hebei exhibiting the highest marginal emission cost and lowest marginal removal cost. Optimal coordinated governance requires Hebei to undertake a greater share of emission reduction, while Beijing and Tianjin reduce less compared with their independent plans. The coordinated model enhances regional resource efficiency, reduces redundant investment, and achieves the same total emission reduction at a lower aggregated cost.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Su et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6e7b5be6419ac0d5442fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17020181
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper