PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Foundations of the Meikyo–Shisui Theory

View Full Paper
YUYoshiki Ueoka

Key Points

  • The aim is to organize the Meikyo–Shisui Theory and propose a translation framework for mathematical objects.
  • Developed a foundational framework for the Meikyo–Shisui Theory.
  • Introduced key technical terms like Sui, Getsu, and Shin-Getsu.
  • Provided minimal sketches using Collatz and Goldbach examples.
  • Utilized retrospective tracing, emergence, and phase transition approaches.
  • Translated mathematical objects into a unified format generating new questions.
  • Demonstrated that the translation process can lead to clear solutions.
  • Extended applicability to various systems such as iterative and search optimization.

Abstract

This paper organizes the foundational framework of the Meikyo–Shisui Theory, proposedby the author, and presents a proposal for a translation theory that enables mutually rein-terpreting mathematical objects within a unified formal structure. Although this frameworkdoes not necessarily aim at directly providing solutions, a central feature is that the processof translation itself gives rise to new perspectives and generates new questions. Dependingon the situation, the translation process may also crystallize directly into a solution, in theform of a procedure or a proof strategy.The theory is constructed using a small number of technical terms: the choice of ob-jects (Sui), the rules associated with them (Getsu), their interface (Sui–Getsu), the up-date rule called the Natural Move (NM), and the extracted essence (Shin-Getsu). Here,Sui/Getsu/Shin-Getsu are not literal translations but are used as proper technical terms,and the term “move” in Natural Move is used in the sense of an update or transition step.To facilitate understanding, this paper presents, not representative examples but minimalsketches: a Collatz-type iteration as an example of a dynamic problem, and a Goldbach-typeproposition as an example of a static problem. Through three approaches—retrospectivetracing, emergence, and phase transition—we clarify what should be identified, such as theidentification of Sui or Getsu, or the definition of the Natural Move. This framework naturallyextends to iterative systems, search and optimization, rewriting systems, finite verification,and graph operations, and provides a viewpoint in which the problem itself emerges throughthe process of translation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yoshiki Ueoka (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6e925be6419ac0d5469chttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18579966
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper