PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Development and Application of Coconut Vegetation Indices (CVIs) for Rapid and Accurate Coconut Mapping Using Sentinel-2 Images: A Case Study of Quezon Province, Philippines

JMJohn Erick J. MalangisABA. C. BlancoATA. M. Tamondong

Key Points

  • To create a simpler and effective method for mapping coconut vegetation using spectral indices from Sentinel-2 images.
  • Developed two Coconut Vegetation Indices (CVI) for dense and sparse coconut vegetation.
  • Utilized Sentinel-2 spectral bands to formulate CVIdense and CVIsparse.
  • Applied thresholds to classify coconut densities and mapped coconut vegetation.
  • CVIDense achieved a User’s Accuracy of 80% and Producer’s Accuracy of 88.89%.
  • CVIsparse recorded a User’s Accuracy of 32.00% and Producer's Accuracy of 53.33%.
  • Both indices demonstrated significant variation in accuracy metrics, with CVIdense outperforming CVIsparse.

Abstract

Abstract. The existing methods for coconut mapping in the Philippines and globally are complex, necessitating the development of a simpler yet rapid and accurate classification technique. This study introduces the first spectral index for coconut mapping. Two Coconut Vegetation Indices were developed: one for dense Coconut Vegetation (CV) and another for sparse CV. CVIdense utilizes three Sentinel-2 bands in its equation (NIR1-SWIR1) / (SWIR1-SWIR2) to map coconut areas with densities >2. 25 x10⁶ sq. m. per 1km pixel. Meanwhile, CVIsparse incorporates four spectral bands in the equation (NIR1-Red) / (SWIR1-SWIR2) for areas with densities ≤ 2. 25 x10⁶ sq. m. per 1km pixel. The formulation of these indices is primarily based on previous studies involving band combinations and the analysis of spectral separability of the acquired coconut reflectance data. The extent of coconut vegetation was mapped using CVIdense with a minimum threshold of 1. 094, while CVIsparse was applied using a threshold range of 0. 4774 to 1. 094. The Balanced Accuracy (BA) metric was used to assess the accuracy, accounting for the imbalanced reference data between coconut and non-coconut classes. CVIdense proved highly effective with User’s Accuracy (UA) of 80%, Producer’s Accuracy (PA) of 88. 89%, and BA of 88. 90%, surpassing CVIsparse, which had accuracies of 32. 00% (UA), 53. 33% (PA), and 74. 10% (BA).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Malangis et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6e925be6419ac0d546dehttps://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-x-5-w4-2025-323-2026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper