PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026The American Surgeon0 citationsOpen Access

Stratifying Early Risk of Death From Hemorrhage in the Era of Whole Blood

View Full Paper
JCJeff ConnerANAndrew NunnMAMartin Avery

Key Points

  • To define and stratify patients' risk of death based on the volume of blood products transfused using a whole blood-first approach.
  • Identified patients who received at least 1 unit of whole blood following injury from January 2016 to November 2021.
  • Constructed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to predict death based on transfusion volume.
  • Stratified patients into low, intermediate, and high-risk categories using positive likelihood ratios.
  • Identified 785 patients who received whole blood during the study period.
  • Volume of whole blood plus packed red blood cells (PRBC) in the first hour was the best predictor of death (AUC 0.66, P < 0.001).
  • Defined low risk as WB + PRBC <3400 cc (14.9% mortality), intermediate risk 3400-5100 cc (39.1% mortality), and high risk >5100 mL (66.7% mortality).

Abstract

Background Definitions of massive transfusion following injury help identify patients at the greatest risk of death. However, these definitions primarily use blood component therapy. The use of whole blood (WB) transfusion protocols has seen a resurgence, with evidence of improved outcomes compared to component therapy. Therefore, our aim was to define and stratify patients into low, intermediate, and high risk for death based on volume of blood products transfused utilizing a WB-first resuscitation strategy. Methods Patients that received at least 1 unit of whole blood following injury between January 2016 and November 2021 were identified. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to predict death based on volume of blood products transfused were constructed. Patients were stratified to low, intermediate, and high risk of death based on positive likelihood ratios. Results There were 785 patients identified to have received at least 1 unit of WB following injury during the study period. Based on ROC curve analysis, the best predictor of death was volume of whole blood plus packed red blood cells (PRBC) in the first hour (AUC 0.66, P 5100 mL in the first hour (66.7% mortality). Discussion The combination of WB + PRBC volume within the first hour following injury is the best predictor of death. Further, volumes of WB + PRBC transfused within the first hour can be used to stratify patients’ risk of death. Level of Evidence Level IV. Study Type Prognostic and Epidemiological.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Conner et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6ebb5be6419ac0d54734https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261423922
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Quantifying the benefit of whole blood on mortality in trauma patients requiring emergent laparotomy2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2High whole blood to total transfusion volume ratio and survival outcomes in patients with trauma requiring massive transfusions.2025
  3. 3When does 1:1 resuscitation really matter? An analysis of 4,858 patients from four traumatic hemorrhage studies2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4Whole blood first resuscitation and association of blood product utilization based on mechanism of injury2026
  5. 5The effect of whole blood resuscitation on in-hospital mortality: A propensity score weighted analysis of patients treated at a Level I trauma center2024