PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Advanced Functional Materials0 citations

Temperature‐Dependent Crystallization in Two‐Step Perovskite Deposition Revealed by In Situ GIWAXS and Machine Learning‐Guided Analysis

View Full Paper
ASAhmed SaadawySHShaimaa HassaneinXHXudong Hu

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how temperature affects the crystallization behavior in two-step perovskite deposition.
  • Designed a temperature-controlled spin-coating system for precise thermal modulation.
  • Conducted in situ GIWAXS measurements to analyze crystallization dynamics of FA 0.5 MA 0.5 PbI 3 films.
  • Investigated the relationship between temperature and α-phase formation during precursor deposition.
  • Identified a non-monotonic relationship between spin-coating temperature and α-phase formation.
  • Found that early-stage crystallization pathways lead to differences in morphology and device performance.
  • Quantified effects of precursor interdiffusion and PbI 2 crystallinity on phase stability and efficiency.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The performance and stability of perovskite solar cells are strongly governed by the crystallization behavior of their active layer. In two‐step sequential deposition, early‐stage film formation plays a decisive role in determining final phase purity and device quality. Guided by a data‐driven analysis of nearly 39 000 devices in the FAIR perovskite database, we identified solvent‐mediated quenching and thermal processing as key variables affecting power conversion efficiency (PCE), particularly in two‐step fabrication. To investigate these effects in real time, we designed and implemented a custom‐built, temperature‐controlled spin‐coating system, enabling precise thermal modulation during precursor deposition. Using this platform, we performed in situ GIWAXS measurements to study the crystallization dynamics of FA 0.5 MA 0.5 PbI 3 films over a temperature range of 30°C–90°C. Our results reveal a non‐monotonic relationship between spin‐coating temperature and α‐phase formation, governed by the interplay between precursor interdiffusion, PbI 2 crystallinity, and δ‐phase suppression. The custom thermal control enabled us to isolate and quantify these competing effects during the earliest stages of film formation, providing mechanistic insight into how spin‐coating temperature governs both phase purity and kinetic pathways in two‐step perovskite systems. Temperature‐dependent SEM and photovoltaic device measurements further demonstrate that early‐stage crystallization pathways directly translate into differences in morphology, charge‐transport continuity, and device performance. These findings inform targeted strategies for optimizing deposition protocols to balance rapid nucleation, phase stability, and device performance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Saadawy et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6edc5be6419ac0d54ae6https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202527797
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper