PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Hepatology Research2 citations

Liver Fibrosis and Steatosis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Cross‐Sectional Matched‐Control Transient Elastography Study (ELASTIBD)

View Full Paper
BABesim Fazil AgargünİŞİbrahim Volkan ŞenkalARAynura Rustamzada

Key Points

  • This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of liver fibrosis and steatosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) compared to matched controls.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional study with 358 adults with IBD and 358 matched controls.
  • Utilized vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE; FibroScan) for liver assessment.
  • Matched controls based on age, sex, BMI, and diabetes.
  • IBD patients had higher rates of significant fibrosis (12.3% vs. 4.2%) and advanced fibrosis (6.7% vs. 0.6%).
  • Higher steatosis rates were found in IBD patients (41.4% vs. 28.3%).
  • Anti-TNF therapy was less frequent in patients with fibrosis and associated with lower odds of fibrosis.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim Metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and liver fibrosis are emerging extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but their true burden and the impact of therapies on liver health have not been fully elucidated. We aimed to assess the prevalence of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in IBD versus matched controls and examine associations with therapies, particularly anti‐TNF agents and corticosteroids. Methods In this cross‐sectional study, 358 adults with IBD and 358 controls individually matched for age, sex, BMI, and diabetes underwent vibration‐controlled transient elastography (VCTE; FibroScan). These are the baseline findings of the ongoing ELASTIBD cohort. Results Patients with IBD had higher rates of significant fibrosis (12.3% vs. 4.2%; adjusted odds ratio aOR 3.31 and 95% CI 1.75–6.26), advanced fibrosis (6.7% vs. 0.6%; OR 8.50 and 95% CI 1.98–36.52), and steatosis (41.4% vs. 28.3%; aOR 2.51 and 95% CI 1.66–3.79) than controls. Among patients with IBD, anti‐TNF therapy was less frequent in those with fibrosis (44.4% vs. 68.5% and p = 0.004) and independently associated with lower odds of fibrosis (aOR 0.39 and 95% CI 0.16–0.95), whereas each steroid course was associated with 41% higher odds (aOR 1.41 and 95% CI 1.04–1.92). Older age and higher BMI were additional predictors. Conclusions Patients with IBD demonstrated threefold higher fibrosis and twofold higher steatosis than matched controls, emphasizing the importance of liver assessment in clinical practice. The inverse association between anti‐TNF exposure and fibrosis suggests inflammation control may reduce hepatic fibrogenesis and supports follow‐up of the ELASTIBD cohort to clarify progression, treatment effects, and liver outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Agargün et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6edc5be6419ac0d54b46https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.70136
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1P0196Liver health in IBD: more metabolic, less inflammatory2026
  2. 2P0189Liver Fibrosis and Steatosis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Cross-sectional Matched-Control Transient Elastography Study (ELASTIBD)2026
  3. 3P0389Beyond the gut: The Impact of IBD-related inflammation on hepatic fibrosis2026
  4. 4P0996Advanced Therapies Reshape Liver Steatosis Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Prospective Cohort Analysis2026
  5. 5INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE AND METABOLIC DYSFUNCTIONASSOCIATED STEATOTIC LIVER DISEASE: PREVALENCE AND PREDICTIVE FACTORS FROM A MOROCCAN CASECONTROL STUDY2025