PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus0 citations

At-Home Pupil Dilation During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Pediatric Population

View Full Paper
YGYoav GlidaiRSRina SuJDJake Diamond

Key Points

  • To assess caregivers' experiences and challenges with at-home pupil dilation during the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Retrospective questionnaire study conducted with caregivers of children under 6 years
  • Prescribed cyclopentolate 1% eye drops for pupil dilation
  • Age of participants divided into three age groups
  • 73.9% of respondents successfully completed at-home pupil dilation
  • Mean task difficulty rated at 3.36 out of 5
  • 65.8% of caregivers would consider this method in the future
  • Most reported cost under 20 USD, with 41.8% not paying for drops

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate caregivers' perspectives, challenges, and difficulties associated with at-home pupil dilation (AHPD) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: In this retrospective questionnaire study, a pediatric ophthalmologist determined eligibility for AHPD in children younger than 6 years. Cyclopentolate 1% eye drops were prescribed. Age was recorded and divided into three age groups. Results: Of 264 respondents, 73.9% (n = 195) completed AHPD, with half having undergone eye dilation in the past (53.7%, n = 116). The mean task difficulty across all groups was 3.36 ± 1.44 (range: 1 to 5). There were no statistical differences in difficulty between groups. Most caregivers stated that they would consider AHPD in the future (65.8%), and 63% reported that this practice saved time and was worth the cost and difficulty associated with AHPD. For more than 80% of responders, the cost was less than 20 United States Dollars, and 41.8% did not need to pay for their drops. The common reasons for not performing AHPD were difficulty (34.8%, n = 24), cost of the drops (30.4%, n = 21), and unclear instructions (8.7%, n = 6). Conclusions: AHPD can be a useful and cost-effective tool, can offer convenience, and may reduce anxiety in the office. The decision to use this approach should be individualized, considering the child's specific needs, parental comfort and ability, and the nature of the assessed ophthalmologic condition.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Glidai et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6edc5be6419ac0d54b67https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20251107-02
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Remote Pediatric Ophthalmology and Adult Strabismus during the COVID-19 Pandemic2021 · 2 citations
  2. 2Comparison of cycloplegia with atropine 1% versus cyclopentolate 1%2023 · 6 citations
  3. 3The Relationship between Patient’s Perceived Waiting Time and Office-Based Practice Satisfaction2006 · 161 citations
  4. 4Comparison of cyclopentolate versus tropicamide cycloplegia: A systematic review and meta-analysis2017 · 115 citations
  5. 5Retinopathy of prematurity screening and risk mitigation during the COVID-19 pandemic2021 · 14 citations