PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Healthcare0 citationsOpen Access

How Intense Is Effective? Exploring Aerobic Exercise Intensity for Knee Osteoarthritis Through a Bayesian NetworkMeta-Analysis

LCLuis Cabrera-DuránJPJavier Palomares-FernándezICIgnacio Canitrot-González

Key Points

  • To determine the most effective intensity level of aerobic exercise for managing symptoms of knee osteoarthritis.
  • Conducted a systematic search across seven databases.
  • Included randomized controlled trials with aerobic exercise-only groups.
  • Evaluated outcomes such as pain, performance in walking and sit-to-stand activities, stiffness, and disability.
  • Utilized Bayesian random-effects network meta-analyses to compare exercise intensity outcomes.
  • Rated evidence certainty using GRADE.
  • Fifteen studies were included, showing a mean methodological quality score of 5.93.
  • Meta-analyses for pain and walking performance yielded non-significant and imprecise results.
  • Overall evidence of exercise intensity effectiveness was rated as very low certainty.

Abstract

Introduction: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is characterized by pain, stiffness, and functional limitation. Aerobic exercise (AE) is a key treatment with proven benefits. Aims: To determine the most effective AE intensity for KOA. Methods: Searches were performed in seven databases, including randomized controlled trials with AE-only groups. Outcomes assessed were pain, walking and sit-to-stand performance, stiffness, and disability. Methodological quality and bias were evaluated. Bayesian random-effects network meta-analyses compared AE intensities, reporting standardized mean differences (Hedges’ g) with 95% credible intervals. Certainty of evidence was rated using GRADE. Results: Fifteen studies were included (mean PEDro score: 5.93), showing “some concerns” or “high risk” of bias. Two meta-analyses (pain and walking performance) were conducted. Comparisons between AE intensities showed non-significant, imprecise results with very low certainty of evidence. Conclusions: Evidence is insufficient to identify the optimal AE intensity for KOA. Limitations include high risk of bias, wide credible intervals, and reliance on indirect comparisons. In this context, clinicians should apply a structured, patient-centered approach to AE prescription, considering gradual progression and monitoring of tolerance, and combine AE with other recommended interventions. High-quality trials with direct comparisons of AE intensity should be conducted for this inconclusive gap.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cabrera-Durán et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6f0d5be6419ac0d5526dhttps://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14040451
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper