PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026The EMBO Journal0 citationsOpen Access

STI1 domain engages transient helices to mediate Dsk2 phase separation and proteasome condensation

NANirbhik AcharyaEDEmily A. DanielTDThuy P. Dao

Key Points

  • The research aims to elucidate the interactions between the STI1 domain and Dsk2 leading to phase separation and condensate formation.
  • Utilized nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to study molecular interactions.
  • Conducted computational simulations to model STI1-helix interactions.
  • Performed in vivo experiments to perturb STI1-helix interactions and assess effects on condensate formation.
  • Identified the STI1 domain as a key driver for Dsk2 self-association and phase separation.
  • Removal of the STI1 domain or its interacting helices significantly decreased Dsk2 condensate formation.
  • In vivo perturbation of STI1-helix interactions led to reduced azide stress-induced Dsk2/proteasome condensates.

Abstract

Abstract Ubiquitin-binding shuttle proteins are important components of stress-induced biomolecular condensates in cells. Yeast Dsk2 scaffolds proteasome-containing condensates via multivalent interactions with proteasomes and polyubiquitinated substrates under stress conditions. Here, we identify the chaperone-binding STI1 domain as the main driver of Dsk2 self-association and phase separation. Using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and computational simulations, we find that the STI1 domain interacts with three transient amphipathic helices within the intrinsically disordered regions of Dsk2. Removal of either the STI1 domain or these helices significantly reduces Dsk2’s propensity to form condensates. In vivo, perturbing STI1-helix interactions, specifically removal of the transient helices, reduces the formation of azide stress-induced Dsk2/proteasome condensates, in line with our in vitro results. Modeling of Dsk2 STI1-helix interactions reveals a binding mode reminiscent of chaperone STI1/DP2 domains interacting with client helices. Our findings support a model whereby STI1-helix interactions important for Dsk2 condensate formation can be replaced by STI1-client interactions for downstream chaperone or other protein quality control outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Acharya et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6f0d5be6419ac0d5527ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s44318-026-00696-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Sti1 participates in the dynamics of protein aggregation triggered by glucose signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae2026
  2. 2ALS mutations disrupt self-association between the ubiquilin STI1 hydrophobic groove and internal placeholder sequences2026
  3. 3The structural and biophysical basis of substrate binding to the hydrophobic groove in Ubiquilin Sti1 domains2024 · 3 citations
  4. 4Stabilization of Integrator/INTAC by the small but versatile DSS1 protein2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Autorepression of yeast Hsp70 cochaperones by intramolecular interactions involving their J-domains2024 · 3 citations