PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026Zoonoses and Public Health0 citationsOpen Access

Bayesian Estimation of True Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors for Leptospira spp. Among Slaughterhouse Workers and Slaughtered Cattle in the Bahr El Ghazal Region of South Sudan

View Full Paper
DODavid OnafruoJKJörn KleinPKPolychronis Kostoulas

Key Points

  • The aim is to estimate the true prevalence of Leptospira spp. and identify risk factors among slaughterhouse workers and cattle.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional study in slaughterhouses
  • Tested serum samples using the microscopic agglutination test (MAT)
  • Employed Bayesian hierarchical models to adjust for diagnostic test imperfections
  • Used structured questionnaires to capture risk factors
  • Estimated true prevalence was 10% in slaughterhouse workers and 85% in slaughtered cattle
  • Factors associated with seropositivity in workers included flaying, protective equipment use, and number of carcasses handled
  • Indicated a 78% probability of leptospirosis presence in randomly selected slaughterhouses
  • Found a 65% probability that infection levels among workers were below 5%

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Leptospirosis is a major but under‐reported zoonotic disease, and epidemiological data from South Sudan remain limited. This study estimated the true prevalence of Leptospira spp. exposure and identified associated risk factors among slaughterhouse workers and slaughtered cattle in Western Bahr El Ghazal. Methods A cross‐sectional study was conducted in major slaughterhouses. Serum samples from workers and cattle were tested using the microscopic agglutination test (MAT). Bayesian hierarchical models were used to adjust for diagnostic test imperfections and to estimate true prevalence. Structured questionnaires captured occupational and animal‐level risk factors for analysis within the Bayesian framework. Results The estimated true prevalence was 10% in slaughterhouse workers and 85% in slaughtered cattle, indicating a high zoonotic exposure risk. Among workers, flaying, inconsistent use of protective equipment, and handling higher numbers of carcasses per day were significantly associated with seropositivity. In slaughtered cattle, exposure varied by breed, age, and sex. The model further indicated a 78% probability that a randomly selected slaughterhouse was affected and a 65% probability that infection levels among workers remained below 5%. Conclusions This study provides the first Bayesian‐based estimates of leptospiral exposure in slaughterhouse settings in Western Bahr El Ghazal. The findings underscore the need to improve occupational safety, strengthen surveillance, and apply One Health approaches to reduce zoonotic transmission. Despite limitations, including lack of environmental data, the Bayesian framework proved effective for generating robust prevalence estimates in a resource‐limited setting. Expanded geographic coverage and incorporation of environmental assessments are recommended to inform targeted leptospirosis control strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Onafruo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699011172ccff479cfe57818https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.70039
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper