PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft0 citationsOpen Access

Inquiring Open Science in educational research: a comparative analysis of research data availability in four selected journals (2018–2023)

MHMarkus HuffEBElke C. Bongartz

Key Points

  • This study aims to analyze the availability of research data in selected educational research journals over time.
  • Comparative analysis of four educational research journals
  • Focus on articles published in 2018, 2020, and 2023
  • Assessment of changes in data-sharing practices
  • Examination of correlations between editorial policies and data availability
  • Research data availability significantly increased over the five-year period
  • Recent articles show a higher frequency of data sharing compared to earlier publications
  • Positive correlation identified between journal-level transparency standards and actual data availability
  • No significant impact of institutional policies on data-sharing practices
  • No statistically significant evidence that persistent identifiers improve long-term data accessibility

Abstract

Abstract This preregistered study investigates the availability of research data in articles from four selected educational research journals over a five-year period. Among the journals examined are two national (German) and two international journals from the years 2018, 2020, and 2023. The study focuses on changes in data-sharing practices as responses to evolving research data policies and infrastructural developments. Findings indicate that the availability of research data has increased substantially over time, with more recent articles providing data more frequently compared to earlier publications. A key observation is the positive correlation between journal-level data transparency standards and actual data availability. This suggests that explicit editorial guidelines and the introduction of Open Science badges effectively incentivize transparency. In contrast, institutional research data policies were found to have no significant impact on data-sharing practices. Finally, the study found no statistically significant evidence that the use of persistent identifiers (e.g., DOI) improves long-term data accessibility, although the effect estimates suggest a possible positive association that warrants further investigation. Overall, the results highlight the importance of clear editorial policies, the introduction of Open Science badges as part of an ongoing effort to strengthen incentive structures, and continued meta-scientific research aimed at monitoring and optimizing research infrastructures. These combined efforts are essential for advancing the practice of open data access in educational research, ensuring that data becomes a lasting resource that supports transparency, replicability, and scientific progress.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Huff et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699011172ccff479cfe578b9https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-026-01371-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Promoting an open research culture2015 · 2,840 citations
  2. 2Persistent identifiers for research data and authors2013 · 1 citations
  3. 3The theory of planned behavior1991 · 87,406 citations
  4. 4Time to recognize authorship of open data2022 · 23 citations
  5. 5The Standardized Data Management Plan for Educational Research2025 · 1 citations