PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026Clinical Transplantation0 citationsOpen Access

Impact of C1‐Inhibitor on Renal Function and Safety Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

View Full Paper
XFXinmiao FengDZDi ZhangYQYang Qiu

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effects of C1-inhibitor on renal function and safety outcomes in kidney transplant recipients.
  • Included four randomized controlled trials comparing C1-inhibitor with saline controls.
  • Assessed methodological quality using the Jadad scoring system and Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.
  • Performed meta-analysis using RevMan software to analyze outcomes like eGFR and adverse events.
  • C1-inhibitor treatment was associated with improved renal function indicated by eGFR.
  • No significant differences found in delayed graft function or antibody-mediated rejection.
  • Serious adverse events rates were comparable between treatment and control groups.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Complement system overactivation contributes to transplanted kidney injury in both ischemia‐reperfusion and antibody‐mediated rejection, ultimately affecting post‐transplant renal function. C1 esterase inhibitor (C1‐INH) may reduce complement‐mediated injury, yet its effects on renal function and safety outcomes remain uncertain in randomized trials. Methods Four RCTs were included, all focusing on the use of C1‐INH in kidney transplant recipients, comparing it with control groups receiving saline. The studies were evaluated for methodological quality using the Jadad scoring system and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Meta‐analysis was performed using RevMan software, assessing outcomes such as renal function (eGFR), AMR incidence, and SAE occurrences. Results This study included four randomized controlled trials encompassing 148 kidney transplant recipients. The findings suggest that treatment with C1‐INH may be associated with an improvement in renal function, as reflected by eGFR. No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of delayed graft function or antibody‐mediated rejection between the treatment and control groups. The overall incidence of serious adverse events was comparable between groups, with no significant differences detected in infection‐related, renal, cardiovascular, or gastrointestinal events. Conclusion The use of C1‐INH may be associated with improved graft renal function following kidney transplantation. However, no significant benefit was observed with respect to delayed graft function or antibody‐mediated rejection. The available evidence suggests an acceptable safety profile for C1‐INH in this setting. Nevertheless, given the clinical heterogeneity of the included studies and the limited cumulative sample size, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary. Larger, well‐designed randomized controlled trials are required to further clarify the therapeutic role of C1‐INH in kidney transplantation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Feng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699011712ccff479cfe58132https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.70479
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper