Why the study?
Exercise stress testing yields inconclusive results in up to 20% of patients, and data on using stress perfusion CMR in this group are limited.
Does the presence of inducible myocardial ischaemia on stress perfusion CMR predict major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with known or suspected CAD and inconclusive exercise stress testing?
Population
414 consecutive patients with known or suspected CAD and inconclusive EST results
Comparison
Presence vs absence of inducible myocardial ischaemia on stress perfusion CMR
Design
Cohort study
Follow-up
Median 6.9 years
Key result
Myocardial ischaemia detected by stress perfusion CMR was an independent predictor of MACE compared to no ischaemia (HR 4.03; 95% CI 1.94 to 8.38; p<0.001).
Authors
Loading...
May refine risk stratification after inconclusive exercise tests; leaves open whether CMR-guided decisions improve outcomes.
Cohort (n=414)
Does the presence of inducible myocardial ischaemia on stress perfusion CMR predict major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with known or suspected CAD and inconclusive exercise stress testing?
Effect estimate: HR 4.03 (95% CI 1.94 to 8.38)
Absolute Event Rate: 2.8% vs 0.8%
p-value: p=<0.001
Stress perfusion CMR effectively stratifies long-term cardiovascular risk in patients with known or suspected CAD who have inconclusive exercise stress testing results.
Tanvisut et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Known or suspected coronary artery disease with inconclusive exercise stress testing (n=414). Stress perfusion CMR with inducible myocardial ischaemia vs. Stress perfusion CMR without inducible myocardial ischaemia was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, acute coronary syndrome, hospitalisation for heart failure, and ischaemic stroke (HR 4.03, 95% CI 1.94 to 8.38, p=<0.001). Myocardial ischaemia detected by stress perfusion CMR was an independent predictor of MACE compared to no ischaemia (HR 4.03; 95% CI 1.94 to 8.38; p<0.001).