PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026Applied Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Practical Considerations for the Development of Two-Stage Deterministic EMS (Cloud–Edge) to Mitigate Forecast Error Impact on the Objective Function

GFGregorio FernándezJOJ. F. Sanz OsorioRRRoberto Rocca

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a two-stage deterministic EMS to mitigate the effects of forecast errors in microgrid operations.
  • Proposed a two-stage architecture with rolling-horizon planning and local setpoint adaptation.
  • Tested the EMS architecture in a simulated environment with varying granularity of planning.
  • Analyzed the performance by comparing forecast accuracy and operational cost reductions.
  • Used a case study of microgrid operations to validate findings.
  • Achieved a 46% reduction in operating cost by changing planning granularity from hourly to 15 minutes.
  • Local adaptation reduced the mean absolute error of EMS performance loss by approximately 50%.
  • The EMS effectively minimized degradation of the objective function while maintaining efficiency.

Abstract

The growing penetration of Distributed Energy Resources (DERs)—such as photovoltaic generation, battery energy storage, electric vehicles, hydrogen technologies and flexible loads—requires advanced Energy Management Systems (EMS) capable of coordinating their operation and leveraging controllability to optimize microgrid performance and enable flexibility provision to the grid. When the physical, electrical, and economic system model is properly defined, the main sources of performance degradation typically arise from forecast uncertainty and temporal discretization effects, which propagate into sub-optimal schedules and infeasible setpoints. This paper proposes and tests a two-stage deterministic EMS architecture featuring rolling-horizon planning at an upper layer and fast local setpoint adaptation at a lower layer, jointly to reduce the impact of forecast errors and other uncertainties on the objective function. The first stage can be deployed either on the edge or in the cloud, depending on computational requirements, whereas the second stage is executed locally, close to the physical assets, to ensure timely corrective action. In the simulated cloud-executed planning case, moving from hourly to 15 min granularity improves the objective value from −49.39€ to −72.12€, corresponding to an approximate 46% reduction in operating cost. In our case study, the proposed second-stage local adaptation can reduce the mean absolute error (MAE) of the EMS performance loss by approximately 50% compared with applying the first-stage schedule without local correction. Results show that this two-stage hierarchical EMS effectively limits objective-function degradation while preserving operational efficiency and robustness.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fernández et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699011932ccff479cfe58518https://doi.org/10.3390/app16041844
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A review on rapid responsive energy storage technologies for frequency regulation in modern power systems2019 · 348 citations
  2. 2Two-stage robust scheduling and real-time load control of community microgrid with multiple uncertainties2023 · 27 citations
  3. 3Hierarchical Control of Droop-Controlled AC and DC Microgrids—A General Approach Toward Standardization2010 · 5,020 citations
  4. 4Control of systems integrating logic, dynamics, and constraints1999 · 3,076 citations
  5. 5Use of model predictive control and weather forecasts for energy efficient building climate control2011 · 1,211 citations