PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Balancing future land use decisions: Embracing co-design in the Pohewa Pae Tawhiti (PPT) research program

View Full Paper
WAWill AllenTKTanira KingiBYBill Young

Key Points

  • The study aims to integrate Māori cultural knowledge into land-use planning for better decision-making outcomes.
  • Developed a co-design approach incorporating Māori cultural knowledge and scientific tools.
  • Engaged Māori land trustees as co-creators in the planning process.
  • Utilized iterative reflection and culturally grounded facilitation to shape the co-design process.
  • Created a framework that aligns land-use planning with environmental, cultural, and social goals.
  • Identified practice-based patterns enhancing community involvement in decision-making.
  • Provided a transferable model for Indigenous and place-based land-use initiatives.

Abstract

In many parts of the world, land-use planning faces increasing pressure to deliver outcomes that are environmentally sustainable, culturally responsive, and socially just. Yet conventional, often technocratic approaches can overlook the place-based values and lived realities that shape decisions. These limits are particularly evident in Indigenous contexts, where relationships with land are closely tied to identity, governance, and long-term stewardship. In Aotearoa New Zealand, for example, Māori land governors must balance environmental, economic, and cultural goals within a distinctive tenure system. However, most existing decision-support tools prioritize production and short-term returns, often overlooking community values and intergenerational aspirations. To address this gap, the Pohewa Pae Tawhiti (PPT) (Visualising Horizons) research program, led by Te Arawa Arataua (Te Arawa Primary Sector Inc.), developed a co-design approach that integrates Māori cultural knowledge and mātauranga Māori (the Māori worldview and system of knowledge) with scientific tools and planning methods. This paper reflects on the co-design process behind the PPT framework, sharing practice-based patterns that emerged through iterative reflection, shared leadership, and culturally grounded facilitation. By positioning Māori land trustees as co-creators from the outset, the program developed a framework that supported decisions aligned with broader and longer-term outcomes. The experience offers a context-specific but transferable contribution to co-design practice, particularly for Indigenous and place-based initiatives seeking to align land-use planning with environmental, cultural, and social goals.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Allen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699011b32ccff479cfe58915https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18618996
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Mahitahi me te Taiao: co-designing in Māori, te Tiriti, transdisciplinary and Aotearoa native forest contexts2026
  2. 2Therapeutic cultural environments as a framework for indigenous-informed urban biodiversity design in Aotearoa New Zealand2026
  3. 3Centring pūrākau as a decolonising force in land-based design in the age of he huringa āhuarangi2025
  4. 4Mapping and Assessing Effective Participatory Planning Processes for Urban Green Spaces in Aotearoa New Zealand’s Diverse Communities2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5Research at the interface between Indigenous knowledge and soil science; weaving knowledges to understand horticultural land use in Aotearoa / New Zealand2025 · 1 citations