PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 2026Trusts & Trustees0 citations

Confidentiality and the open justice principle in trust and estate proceedings: how the BVI Court balances competing interests

View Full Paper
JPJames PetkovicJSJhneil Stewart

Key Points

  • The article examines the BVI Court's approach to confidentiality and open justice in estate cases.
  • Analyzes recent BVI authority and comparative common law jurisprudence
  • Explores mechanisms such as confidentiality clubs and private hearings
  • Focuses on safeguarding sensitive information during proceedings
  • Highlights the tension between confidentiality and transparent justice
  • Illustrates how practical measures are employed to protect sensitive details
  • Demonstrates that vulnerable beneficiaries are considered in the Court's decisions

Abstract

Abstract This article examines how the BVI Court navigates the tension between confidentiality and the open justice principle in trust and estate proceedings. It explores the Court’s pragmatic approach to protecting sensitive information while maintaining transparency, particularly in cases involving private wealth, vulnerable beneficiaries, or cross-border disclosure. Focusing on mechanisms such as confidentiality clubs, anonymised judgments, redactions, private hearings, and disclosure safeguards under the CPR, the article analyses recent BVI authority alongside comparative common law jurisprudence to illustrate how competing interests are balanced in practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Petkovic et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6992652ceb1f82dc367a11a1https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttag006
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper