PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 2026Philosophy of Management0 citationsOpen Access

Who Cares? For Whom? How the Ethics of Care Might Inform Boardroom Governance, and Beyond

View Full Paper
DNDonald Nordberg

Key Points

  • This paper explores how the ethics of care can inform governance practices in corporate boardrooms.
  • Conceptual analysis of governance issues and ethical frameworks
  • Discussion of fiduciary duties and accountability challenges
  • Examination of the trolley problem analogy in board decision-making
  • Identifies ethics of care as a potential guide for directors
  • Highlights tensions between individual and collective decision-making
  • Suggests that adopting a care perspective may improve accountability and governance

Abstract

Abstract A persistent problem in corporate governance is the defining scope of the fiduciary and other duties of directors of public corporations, private companies, and other organisations that adopt a corporate form. Moreover, over the past three decades, public policy initiatives have sought to foster greater director accountability not just as a solution to the agency problem but also in aid of broader social goals. This push-and-pull of policy can confuse decision-making and for directors pose a version of the famous “trolley problem” in ethics, with the added complication that boards must decide on how to act collectively and not as individuals. This conceptual paper poses the question: Might the ethics of care – sometimes labelled “feminist ethics” – come to the rescue?

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Donald Nordberg (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69926575eb1f82dc367a158chttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-025-00365-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper