PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 2026Magnetic Resonance in Medicine0 citations

Effects of RF ‐Induced Heating of Orthopedic Implants Across Stages of Bone Fracture Healing and Anatomical Variability: In Silico Assessment Using Computational Human Models at 1.5 T and 3.0 T MRI

View Full Paper
ANAnanya NandikantiJZJianfeng ZhengSLStuart A. Long

Key Points

  • Assess RF-induced heating of orthopedic implants at different stages of bone fracture healing.
  • Utilized computational human models representing surgery, scar, and healed phases.
  • Analyzed tibial nail and reverse shoulder arthroplasty implants in the models.
  • Evaluated effects of tissue adhesive and its leakage on heating.
  • RF-induced heating varies across healing stages and anatomical models.
  • Localized tissue properties and implantation location affect heating significantly.
  • Findings support the need for improved MRI safety protocols for orthopedic implants.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose This study presents an in‐silico assessment of RF‐induced heating of orthopedic implants during various stages of bone fracture healing, namely surgery, scar, and healed phases, under 1.5 T and 3.0 T MRI. Methods Computational human models Duke, Ella, and Fats were used to develop the stages of bone fracture healing. These models reflect clinically relevant conditions and also include assessment of the surgery model with the presence of tissue adhesive and its leakage. Two types of orthopedic implants are analyzed: (a) a tibial nail system embedded within bone, and (b) a reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) implant located partially in bone and muscle. Results Results demonstrate variations in RF‐induced heating across stages of bone fracture healing and anatomical models, indicating that localized tissue properties, location of the implantation as well as the presence of tissue adhesive significantly influence RF‐induced heating. Conclusion The findings highlight the importance of (a) integrating clinically relevant in silico models to evaluate the safety of patients undergoing MRI scans which are not included in the current testing standards for passive implantable medical devices, and (b) accurate labeling of orthopedic implants for testing in an MRI environment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nandikanti et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69926575eb1f82dc367a15f4https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70296
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper