PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 2026BMC Infectious Diseases1 citationsOpen Access

Acquired linezolid resistance in DR-TB: genotype-phenotype discordance and molecular heterogeneity in a retrospective cohort

View Full Paper
WZWenqiang ZhouQWQingfeng WangWNWenjuan Nie

Key Points

  • This study investigates the molecular mechanisms and risk factors associated with acquired linezolid resistance in drug-resistant tuberculosis.
  • Conducted a retrospective study of 61 DR-TB patients
  • Analyzed paired Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates with MIC testing
  • Examined sequencing of rplC, rrl, and rplD genes
  • Used logistic regression for risk factor analysis
  • Acquired linezolid resistance observed in 31.1% of patients
  • Younger age and prolonged therapy were identified as independent risk factors
  • Identified multiple mutation events, including rplC T460C in 57.7% of cases
  • Phenotypic-genotypic discordance found in 11.5% of resistant isolates

Abstract

Linezolid is an important drug for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB). Acquired linezolid resistance threatens treatment efficacy. This study aimed to analyze the risk factors and molecular mechanisms of linezolid-acquired resistance in a clinical cohort. We conducted a retrospective study of 61 patients with DR-TB who failed linezolid-containing regimens (2017–2021). Paired baseline and post-treatment Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates were subjected to linezolid Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing (Microplate Alamar Blue Assay) and sequencing of rplC , rrl (23 S rRNA), and rplD . Acquired resistance was defined as a ≥ 4-fold increase in MIC or the presence of new resistance-conferring mutation. Risk factors were analyzed using logistic regression. Acquired linezolid resistance occurred in 31.1% (19/61) of patients. Younger age ( 14.3 months; OR = 1.07/month, p = 0.004) were the independent risk factors. Sequencing revealed 26 mutation events across the longitudinal isolates; 57.7% (15/26) harbored rplC T460C (Cys154Arg), whereas 38.5% (10/26) had rrl mutations (G2270T, G2814T). A novel rplD A518T (Lys173Ile) mutation emerged concurrently with the rplC T460C mutation. Phenotypic-genotypic discordance occurred in 11.5% (3/26) of resistant isolates, including one strain with MIC elevation (0.25→4.0 mg/L) lacking target mutations. Linezolid resistance correlated with prior resistance to clofazimine (kappa = 0.538, p < 0.001), amikacin, and pasiniazid. Young age, extended therapy, and ribosomal mutations drive linezolid resistance. Pretreatment susceptibility screening is critical.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69926a620d0ce0adc9976a5ahttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-026-12869-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cross-Resistance between Clofazimine and Bedaquiline through Upregulation of MmpL5 in Mycobacterium tuberculosis2014 · 493 citations
  2. 2Importance of the Efflux Pump Systems in the Resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to Fluoroquinolones and Linezolid2007 · 126 citations
  3. 3Linezolid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates at a tertiary care centre in Mumbai, India2021 · 34 citations
  4. 4Linezolid resistance in patients with drug-resistant TB2023 · 10 citations
  5. 5In Vitro Isolation and Characterization of Oxazolidinone-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis2017 · 44 citations