PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 17, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Estimating the Target Strength of Sardine (Sardinops sagax) as a Function of Swimming Orientation

View Full Paper
GPGeunchang ParkJKJ.-H. KimHYHyunsuk Yoon

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how the target strength of sardines varies with their swimming tilt angle in flowing water.
  • Utilized Kirchhoff-ray-mode (KRM) model for target strength estimation.
  • Measured swimming tilt angles at flow velocities of 30 cm/s and 50 cm/s.
  • Conducted analysis on 17 sardine samples across four frequency bands (38, 70, 120, 200 kHz).
  • At 30 cm/s, sardines showed mean tilt angle of 4.0° with normalized TS values ranging from -64.7 dB to -66.9 dB.
  • At 50 cm/s, sardines exhibited a mean tilt angle of -2.2° with TS values from -62.9 dB to -64.8 dB.
  • Sardines swimming against the flow had lower TS than those swimming with the flow, indicating the importance of flow velocity in acoustic surveys.

Abstract

The swimming tilt angle of fish is one of the key factors influencing the estimation of target strength (TS). Therefore, understanding how TS varies with changes in swimming tilt angle is essential. This study employed the Kirchhoff-ray-mode (KRM) model to estimate TS and examine variations in the swimming tilt angle of sardines under flowing water conditions. Swimming tilt angles were measured at flow velocities of 30 and 50 cm/s. The KRM model was utilized to estimate TS for 17 sardine samples (total length: 13.0–24.6 cm) across four frequency bands (38, 70, 120, and 200 kHz). At a flow velocity of 30 cm/s, sardines swimming against the flow exhibited a mean swimming tilt angle of 4.0° ± 14.0°, with normalized mean TScm values of −64.7 dB at 38 kHz, −65.7 dB at 70 kHz, −66.4 dB at 120 kHz, and −66.9 dB at 200 kHz. At a flow velocity of 50 cm/s, sardines swimming against the flow showed a mean swimming tilt angle of −2.2° ± 10.1°, with normalized mean TScm values of −62.9 dB at 38 kHz, −63.7 dB at 70 kHz, −64.3 dB at 120 kHz, and −64.8 dB at 200 kHz. Considering the results of this study and the swimming behavior of sardines against the flow, the target strength of sardines swimming with the flow may be of less concern. Therefore, when conducting acoustic surveys, it is more efficient to account for flow velocity conditions rather than swimming direction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Park et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699405494e9c9e835dfd6143https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14040368
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Investigations on Target Strength Estimation Methods: A Case Study of Chub Mackerel (Scomber japonicus) in the Northwest Pacific Ocean2024 · 7 citations
  2. 2A study on the broadband target strength characteristics of Pacific herring ( Clupea pallasii ) and Chub mackerel ( Scomber japonicus ) for species identification2025
  3. 3Angle-dependent target strength variability of Kawakawa (2026
  4. 4Acoustic target strengths and swimbladder morphology of Chub mackerel Scomber japonicus in the Northwest Pacific Ocean2024
  5. 5Acoustic Scattering Characteristics of Micropterus salmoides Using a Combined Kirchhoff Ray-Mode Model and In Situ Measurements2025