Introduction Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common cause of hospitalisation and decompensation in the hospital, is routinely managed by a wide variety of subspecialties, and requires a host of both technical and non-technical skills (NTS). Simulation-based training (SBT) exercises are an excellent means of training physicians and other healthcare professionals in both technical skills and NTS and are frequently used to teach and assess management of high-stress situations such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation and trauma situations. The manner in which SBT is used to train other types of clinical situations—and at what frequency—is less clear. The extent to which such training programmes are evaluated is also not clear. Here, we intend to characterise the body of literature describing SBT programmes for bedside management of GIB. In doing so, we will gain valuable insight into the current state of SBT as it relates to training healthcare professionals to handle complicated clinical situations. Methods and analysis Our review will follow the six-stage framework outlined by Arksey and O’Malley while considering elaborations and guidance made by Levac et al and the Joanna Briggs Institute. The protocol and review will be created in alignment with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses—scoping review checklist and explanatory paper. Using a carefully constructed search strategy, the following databases will be queried from their inception through 31 December 2025: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and ERIC. Following the initial database query and two-step screening process, included articles will be systematically examined and will serve as our data source. Our efforts will ultimately answer the following research question: How is simulation-based training currently used to teach bedside management of GIB to physicians (residents, fellows and attending physicians), and how are these simulation-based training exercises studied and evaluated? Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board is not required for this study since all investigations are being carried out on previously published manuscripts. Final results will be compiled and submitted for publication once the study has been completed and all data has been charted/analysed.
Morton et al. (Sun,) studied this question.