(1) Background: Chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI) is a complex, high-risk procedure compared to standard percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Scoring systems such as the Japanese Chronic Total Occlusion (J-CTO), European Chronic Total Occlusion (EuroCTO), and Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention (PROGRESS-CTO) evaluate lesion difficulty and predict outcomes. Nutritional status, measured by the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), may also affect procedural success and long-term survival. The objective of this study was to evaluate the combined impact of procedural complexity and nutritional status on the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing CTO-PCI. (2) Methods: We analyzed 118 patients undergoing CTO-PCI between May 2021 and March 2022. Procedural complexity was assessed using the J-CTO, EuroCTO, and PROGRESS-CTO scores, while nutritional status was evaluated using the PNI. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality and repeat revascularization, which were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses. (3) Results: Adverse outcomes occurred in 25 patients (mortality: 17; revascularization: 8). Patients with adverse outcomes had significantly lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (46 ± 13.7% vs. 52.1 ± 10.5%, p < 0.001), lower PNI (p < 0.001), and higher J-CTO, EuroCTO, and PROGRESS-CTO scores (all p < 0.05). A PNI cut-off value of 46 predicted mortality with a sensitivity of 70.6% and specificity of 75.2% (area under the curve AUC = 0.739, p = 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified LVEF (hazard ratio HR 0.966, p = 0.036), J-CTO score (HR 1.598, p = 0.027), and PNI (HR 0.925, p = 0.022) as independent predictors of mortality. (4) Conclusion: Both procedural complexity and nutritional status significantly influence outcomes following CTO-PCI. Incorporating PNI together with procedural complexity scores into pre-procedural assessments may enhance risk stratification and optimize patient management.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gürkan Karaca
Ahmet Ekmekci
Ali Kimiaei
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Karaca et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6994058c4e9c9e835dfd6780 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/life16020338
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: