ABSTRACT Electroencephalography (EEG), essential for diagnosing and researching neurological disorders, utilizes gelled electrodes, which present limitations in safety, comfort, stability, and usability, particularly in long‐term applications. We introduce a novel dry EEG technology using soft, porous, low‐impedance, Ti 3 C 2 T x MXene electrodes. The 10 Hz impedance of these electrodes across scalp locations is 2.1 ± 1.8 kΩ, comparable to gelled Ag/AgCl electrodes and below clinical thresholds. Ti 3 C 2 T x electrodes maintain stable impedance over 4.5 h on agarose phantoms and retain structure after 50 cycles of 80% axial compression. These electrodes are suitable for simultaneous EEG and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), exhibiting no significant displacement, heating, or unsafe charge densities under TMS fields. We benchmarked dry electrodes across recording scenarios and hair types against gelled electrodes. In full‐scalp steady‐state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) recordings, gelled and Ti 3 C 2 T x electrodes were highly correlated (R > 0.89). Clinical EEG with Ti 3 C 2 T x electrodes captured all features observed with gelled electrodes (R > 0.84) and was rated for clinical quality by neurologists. Furthermore, dry MXene EEG electrode recorded high‐quality EEG for over 4 h. In mobile EEG, Ti 3 C 2 T x electrodes did not induce signal distortions and enabled task‐specific feature detection with a comparable signal‐to‐noise ratio to gelled electrodes. These findings establish dry Ti 3 C 2 T x electrodes as an alternative to gel‐based systems, with broad potential in clinical diagnostics and research.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sneha Shankar
Jakob Michiels
Ksenija Tasich
Advanced Science
University of Pennsylvania
University of Rochester
Drexel University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shankar et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6994058c4e9c9e835dfd67ae — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202511486