PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Media International Australia0 citationsOpen Access

Problematising professionalism: examining the media discourse of consultants’ professionalism in the 2023 PwC Australia government consulting scandal

View Full Paper
SSSonya Sandham

Key Points

  • The research aims to explore the challenges to the professionalism of public sector consultants highlighted by the PwC Australia scandal.
  • Analysis of 331 news media articles published over five months
  • Identification of two distinct discursive phases: 'bad consultant' and 'good system'
  • Examination of the interplay between media discourse and Senate inquiries
  • Initial phase emphasizes the archetype of the 'bad consultant' and critiques their expertise
  • Subsequent phase focuses on systemic issues regarding the role of consultants in public interest
  • Discussion highlights the complex relationship between consultants and government transparency

Abstract

This research examines how the 2023 PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) Australia consulting scandal challenged understandings of what it means to be a public sector consultant. The scandal problematised the professionalism of consultants working for government in the discursive field of the media scandal – which overlapped with the Australian Senate inquiry on the integrity and management of consulting firms – and aired long-standing criticisms of consultants. Through an analysis of 331 news media articles published over five months, two distinct phases are identified: the ‘bad consultant’ and the ‘good system’. In the initial phase, the archetype of the ‘bad consultant’ challenges consultants’ performance of professionalism in terms of ‘expertise’. In the subsequent phase, there is a discursive shift to systemic concerns about the prevalence of consultants at the intersection of public interest and the hybrid government context. At stake during this discourse event was not whether consultants met their own definition of professionalism, but rather how consultants’ relationship with government and performance of professionalism was defined in terms of ‘public interest’ – itself a discursive construct.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sonya Sandham (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a77aecb39a600b3ed1b7https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878x261421773
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A political economy of communication analysis of PR News: Intern status, skills, and conflict within the public relations industry2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2The System of Professions1988 · 7,271 citations
  3. 3Integrating Moral Outrage in Situational Crisis Communication Theory: A Triadic Appraisal Model for Crises2023 · 73 citations
  4. 4Consultocracy and its discontents: A critical typology and a call for a research agenda2018 · 145 citations
  5. 5“Buying” Corporate Social Responsibility: Organisational Identity Orientation as a Determinant of Practice Adoption2015 · 52 citations