PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026npj Digital Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Health economic simulation modeling of an AI-enabled clinical decision support system for coronary revascularization

TMTom MullieAPArjun PuriEBEmma Bogner

Key Points

  • Evaluate the economic value of an AI-enabled clinical decision support system for coronary revascularization.
  • Conducted a retrospective health economic simulation study
  • Utilized real-world data from 25,942 patients with obstructive coronary artery disease
  • Simulated AI predictions for treatment decisions regarding medical therapy, PCI, and CABG
  • 72.4% of treatment decisions shifted to more economically optimized options at $50,000 per QALY
  • Average cost saving of $22,960 per patient
  • QALY gain equivalent to $22,439 per patient observed
  • 53.2% decision shift in a conservative scenario with limited AI adoption led to an average QALY gain of $32,214 per patient

Abstract

While artificial intelligence (AI) models have been developed to support coronary revascularization decision-making, health economic evaluation of such models has been rare. We conducted a retrospective health economic simulation modeling study using real-world data from 25, 942 adult patients with obstructive coronary artery disease in Alberta, Canada to evaluate the economic value of an AI-enabled coronary revascularization decision support system. Clinicians deciding among medical therapy only, percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary artery bypass grafting were simulated to be provided with AI predictions of 3- and 5-year major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. At a willingness-to-pay of 50, 000 per quality adjusted life year (QALY), as many as 72. 4% of all actual treatment decisions shifted to a different health economically optimized treatment, resulting in an average cost saving of 22, 960 and a QALY gain equivalent to up to 22, 439 per patient. Even in a conservative scenario where clinicians' AI adoption was assumed to be limited, 53. 2% of the actual decisions shifted, resulting in an average QALY gain equivalent to up to 32, 214 per patient. AI can potentially optimize the health system level economic value of treatment decisions in the form of reduced costs stemming from fewer future complications and improved patient outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mullie et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a798ecb39a600b3ed599https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02430-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The rationale for Heart Team decision-making for patients with stable, complex coronary artery disease2013 · 221 citations
  2. 2Electronic Medical Record–Based Machine Learning Approach to Predict the Risk of 30-Day Adverse Cardiac Events After Invasive Coronary Treatment: Machine Learning Model Development and Validation2022 · 18 citations
  3. 3Optimal Medical Therapy with or without PCI for Stable Coronary Disease2007 · 4,724 citations
  4. 4Trial of Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Coronary Disease2015 · 513 citations
  5. 5Design of the Future REvascularization Evaluation in patients with Diabetes mellitus: Optimal management of Multivessel disease (FREEDOM) Trial2008 · 192 citations