PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics0 citationsOpen Access

The Ionospheric Lunar Tidal Response to the 2020–2021 Sudden Stratospheric Warming Observed by COSMIC‐2, ICON and Modeled by SD‐WACCMX, TIE‐GCM

View Full Paper
DADeepali AggarwalSKSunil KumarBMB. C. Martinez

Key Points

  • The research aims to explore how disruptions in the stratospheric polar vortex affect M2 lunar tides and F-region electron density.
  • Analyzed GIS data from COSMIC‐2 during 2020–2021 SSW event.
  • Observed changes in M2 lunar tides at low latitudes and their relation to electron density.
  • Utilized SD‐WACCM‐X and TIE‐GCM for modeling responses and simulations.
  • Examined ion continuity equations to assess contributions of electrodynamics and neutral winds.
  • M2 lunar tides showed a 16% enhancement in F-region electron density during SSW.
  • Vertical plasma drifts increased by approximately 114% during SSW.
  • Transport contributions from neutral winds rose by about 43%.
  • Model simulations reproduced M2 tidal signatures consistent with observed data.

Abstract

Abstract This study examines how the breakdown of the stratospheric polar vortex influences lunar semidiurnal (M2) tides in F‐region electron density using Global Ionospheric Specification (GIS) data from the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate‐2 (COSMIC‐2). During the 2020–2021 Sudden Stratospheric Warming (SSW) event—marked by an exceptionally disrupted polar vortex—we observe up to a 16% enhancement in the M2 lunar tide at low latitudes (equatorial ionization anomaly) around 300 km altitude relative to the mean state. The response of M2 in vertical plasma drifts measured by the ion velocity meter on board the Ionospheric Connection Explorer satellite shows similar variability. Whole‐atmosphere model simulations using the Specified Dynamics Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model with thermosphere and ionosphere extension (SD‐WACCM‐X) reproduce consistent M2 tidal signatures in E‐region zonal winds, F‐region vertical drifts, and electron density. To quantify the relative contributions of electrodynamics and neutral winds, we analyzed the ion continuity equation using the National Center for Atmospheric Research Thermosphere–Ionosphere–Electrodynamics General Circulation Model with SD‐WACCM‐X as the lower boundary. Results show M2 tides impact F‐region electron densities primarily through vertical plasma drifts, which increase by ∼114% during the SSW, while transport by neutral winds rises by ∼43%. These findings confirm that vertical drifts dominate lunar tide transport, with neutral winds providing a secondary contribution.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aggarwal et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a798ecb39a600b3ed5a5https://doi.org/10.1029/2025ja034731
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Electrodynamics and plasma processes in the ionosphere1987 · 10 citations
  2. 2Gravity wave dynamics and effects in the middle atmosphere2003 · 2,812 citations
  3. 3Migrating and nonmigrating diurnal tides in the middle and upper atmosphere excited by tropospheric latent heat release2002 · 895 citations
  4. 4Day‐to‐Day Variability of the Semidiurnal Tide in the F‐Region Ionosphere During the January 2021 SSW From COSMIC‐2 and ICON2022 · 54 citations
  5. 5Revisiting the Modulations of Ionospheric Solar and Lunar Migrating Tides During the 2009 Stratospheric Sudden Warming by Using Global Ionosphere Specification2019 · 29 citations