PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Nutrients0 citationsOpen Access

The Prognostic Value of Dynamic Changes in Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) During Treatment in Lung Cancer: Is Improvement a Better Predictor than Baseline?

EMEren MingsarİÖİlhan ÖZTOPSÜSinan Ünal

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the prognostic significance of changes in the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) during lung cancer treatment.
  • Retrospective analysis of 478 lung cancer patients.
  • Calculation of PNI based on serum albumin levels and total lymphocyte counts.
  • Categorization of dynamic PNI changes as increased, stable, or decreased.
  • Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses to assess survival relationships.
  • Patients with higher baseline (PNI1) and posttreatment (PNI2) scores had longer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
  • Increased PNI during treatment correlates with significantly longer OS compared to stable or decreased values (p = 0.023).
  • Multivariate analysis identifies cancer type and PNI2 as significant prognostic factors (p = 0.007), while dynamic improvement in PNI is a critical indicator.

Abstract

Objective: Although the baseline prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a well-known prognostic factor in lung cancer, the clinical significance of its fluctuation during treatment remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of dynamic changes in the PNI and to determine whether improvements in nutritional and immune status are correlated with survival outcomes. Methods: A total of 478 patients diagnosed with lung cancer were retrospectively analyzed. The PNI was calculated on the basis of serum albumin levels and total lymphocyte counts. The baseline value was termed PNI1, and the posttreatment value was termed PNI2. The dynamic changes in PNIΔ were categorized as increased, stable, or decreased. Relationships between these dynamic parameters and Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival were assessed using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses. Results: The median follow-up was 19.9 months. Patients with higher PNI1 and PNI2 scores had significantly longer OS and PFS. Notably, patients who demonstrated an increase in PNIΔ during the treatment course had significantly longer overall survival than those with stable or decreased scores (p = 0.023). Multivariate analysis revealed that while cancer type and the posttreatment PNI (PNI2) were identified as independent prognostic factors (p = 0.007 for PNI2), the dynamic improvement in the PNI emerged as a critical indicator of a better clinical trajectory according to univariate analysis. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the PNI is not merely a static baseline marker but also a dynamic biomarker that reflects the host’s response to treatment and disease. An increase in PNI values during treatment is associated with improved survival, suggesting that dynamic monitoring of nutritional and immune status provides valuable prognostic information for patient management in lung cancer patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mingsar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a798ecb39a600b3ed6f8https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18040644
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper