PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026International Journal of Cancer0 citationsOpen Access

Detection of MSI signals from peripheral blood for monitoring response to immune checkpoint blockade therapy in patients with advanced microsatellite‐unstable gastrointestinal cancers: A pilot study

View Full Paper
AAAysel AhadovaLBLena BohaumilitzkyTWThomas Walle

Key Points

  • The aim was to explore the utility of detecting microsatellite instability (MSI) in extracellular vesicle DNA to monitor immune checkpoint blockade therapy response.
  • Analyzed blood and tumor samples from 19 patients before and during therapy.
  • Evaluated MSI in extracellular vesicle DNA and cell-free DNA using four mononucleotide markers.
  • Compared MSI detection rates between blood samples and controls.
  • MSI detected in EV DNA in 8 out of 18 patients and in cfDNA in 9 out of 18 patients.
  • 93% concordance in MSI detection between EV DNA and cfDNA methods.
  • Transition from MSI to non-MSI during treatment linked to clinical benefit.

Abstract

Abstract Microsatellite instability (MSI) is associated with high immunogenicity in tumors due to the abundance of neoantigens, making MSI cancers particularly responsive to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy. However, a substantial proportion of patients with MSI gastrointestinal (GI) adenocarcinomas do not benefit from ICB, and non‐invasive biomarkers for monitoring treatment response are lacking. This study investigated the utility of MSI detection in extracellular vesicle (EV) DNA as a liquid biopsy‐based approach for therapy monitoring in patients with advanced MSI GI cancers undergoing ICB therapy and compared it with the analysis of cell‐free (cf) DNA. Blood ( n = 52) and tumor samples ( n = 16) were collected from 19 patients before and during therapy. Plasma from 18 patients and 30 healthy controls was analyzed for MSI using four diagnostic mononucleotide markers in both EV DNA and cell‐free DNA (cfDNA). MSI was detected in EV DNA in 8 out of 18 patients and in cfDNA in 9 out of 18 patients, with high concordance (93%) between the two approaches. None of the healthy controls showed MSI signals. MSI detection was more frequent before therapy initiation compared to during therapy time points, and a transition from MSI to non‐MSI status during treatment was associated with clinical benefit or objective response. This switch often occurred before the first staging at 3 months. Thus, MSI analysis in EV DNA is a promising minimally invasive tool for real‐time monitoring of ICB therapy response in MSI GI cancer patients, yielding results comparable to cfDNA while providing handling advantages, and warrants further validation in larger cohorts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ahadova et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a7a5ecb39a600b3ed7b4https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70387
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper