PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy0 citationsOpen Access

Oral β‐Lactams for Complicated Urinary Tract Infections: A Systematic Review and Point‐Counterpoint Comparison With Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole and Fluoroquinolones

View Full Paper
ACAshlan J. Kunz CoyneJBJeannette BouchardSDSpencer H. Durham

Key Points

  • This review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral β-lactams as alternatives to fluoroquinolones and TMP/SMX for complicated urinary tract infections.
  • Conducted a systematic review of studies published from January 2000 to December 2025
  • Included randomized trials and observational cohort studies
  • Focused on clinical effectiveness, microbiological outcomes, and safety for cUTIs
  • Synthesized data narratively due to study heterogeneity
  • Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria and were analyzed
  • Oral β-lactams were found to be as effective as fluoroquinolones and TMP/SMX for cUTIs
  • High bioavailability oral β-lactams showed success rates over 90% when dosed correctly
  • Lower adverse event rates observed with β-lactams (1.3%) compared to FQs (2.3%) and TMP/SMX (5.7%)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Rising resistance and toxicity concerns with fluoroquinolones (FQs) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) have prompted interest in oral β‐lactams as alternatives for complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs). This review evaluates the effectiveness, safety, and pharmacokinetic (PK) considerations of oral β‐lactams compared to FQs and TMP/SMX in these clinical contexts. A structured point‐counterpoint discussion explores their role in antimicrobial stewardship and patient‐centered therapy. Methods A systematic PubMed search identified studies published between January 2000 and December 2025. Eligible studies included randomized trials and observational cohort studies evaluating clinical effectiveness, microbiological outcomes, or safety of oral β‐lactams for cUTIs or bacteremic UTI compared with FQs or TMP/SMX. Outcomes of interest included treatment success, recurrence, adverse events, and PK considerations. Excluded studies involved special populations, nontraditional agents, or infections outside the scope of cUTI. Data were synthesized narratively due to heterogeneity in study design and outcome reporting. Results Seventeen observational studies met the inclusion criteria. Oral β‐lactams demonstrated comparable effectiveness to FQs and TMP/SMX for cUTIs, including bacteremic UTI, when dosed appropriately. Oral β‐lactams with high oral bioavailability (e.g., cephalexin, cefpodoxime, cefuroxime, amoxicillin/clavulanate), showed success rates exceeding 90%, but recurrence was higher when underdosed. Oral β‐lactams had lower adverse event rates (1.3%) compared to FQs (2.3%) and TMP/SMX (5.7%), but may carry limitations including frequent dosing, variable bioavailability, and susceptibility testing challenges. Conclusions Although not traditionally recognized as first‐line therapy, select oral β‐lactams demonstrated effectiveness comparable to FQs or TMP/SMX for cUTIs and bacteremic UTI and can serve as effective alternatives in appropriately selected patients. When optimally dosed, these β‐lactams achieve comparable outcomes with favorable safety profiles and antimicrobial stewardship advantages. Randomized trials are needed to confirm these observational findings and to better define optimal dosing strategies and shorter treatment durations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Coyne et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a7c3ecb39a600b3edc03https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.70118
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper