Additive manufacturing is increasingly used in construction, yet reliable quality assurance for three-dimensional-printed concrete elements remains a major challenge. Existing digital defect-detection methods, particularly voxel-based and mesh-based approaches, are often evaluated separately, which limits understanding of their relative capabilities for construction-scale inspection. This study establishes a controlled comparison of the two representations using identical scan-to-design data, consistent preprocessing, and unified defect thresholding. A voxel pipeline employing signed distance fields and a three-dimensional convolutional neural network, and a mesh pipeline using triangular surface reconstruction, geometric surface descriptors, and MeshCNN, were applied to structured-light scans of printed clay wall segments containing intentional voids, material buildup, and layer-height inconsistencies. Across common performance metrics, the voxel-based method achieved a recall of 95% for spatially coherent, volumetric-consistent void-related anomalies inferred from surface geometry, reflecting improved aggregation of distributed deviations, while the mesh-based method attained a mean surface defect localization error of 0.32 mm with a substantially lower computational cost in runtime and memory. These results clarify representation-dependent trade-offs and provide guidance for selecting appropriate inspection pipelines in extrusion-based construction. The findings establish a controlled, construction-oriented comparative framework for digital defect detection and support more efficient, reliable, and scalable quality-assurance workflows for sustainable additive manufacturing.
Mirmotalebi et al. (Mon,) studied this question.