PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Minerals0 citationsOpen Access

Lithofacies Identification and Gas-Bearing Potential Evaluation of Shallow Shale Gas in China: A Case Study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations, Northern Guizhou

PLPeiyan LiJYJing YinMXMing Xie

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the lithofacies and gas-bearing potential of marine shales in the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations of northern Guizhou, China.
  • Analyzed 40 core samples from the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation.
  • Employed whole-rock XRD, total organic carbon measurement, and in situ gas content assessment.
  • Classified samples using a normalized quartz-clay-carbonate ternary diagram.
  • Most samples classified within the siliceous-clay transition field.
  • Total organic carbon ranged from 4% to 6%, with 57.5% of samples in the 4-5% bin.
  • In situ gas content was highest in clay-rich shale (maximum of 4.78 cm3/g) and lowest in siliceous shale (minimum of 0.15 cm3/g).

Abstract

Gas-bearing potential in marine shales is governed by lithofacies-scale mineralogical heterogeneity and its coupling with organic-matter enrichment. We analyzed 40 core samples from the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Zheng’an area, northern Guizhou (wells AD-2, AD-3, and AD-4), using whole-rock XRD, total organic carbon (w(TOC) %), and in situ gas content (cm3/g). A normalized quartz–clay–carbonate ternary diagram was applied to classify samples into siliceous shale (S), clay-rich shale (CM), calcareous shale (C), and mixed shale (M), and further into subfacies (e.g., S-1, S-2, and CM-1). Most samples plotted within the siliceous–clay transition field. Against this compositional background, w(TOC) mainly ranged from 4% to 6%, with the 4–5% bin accounting for 57.5%; well AD-4 showed a relatively stable distribution, whereas wells AD-2 and AD-3 exhibited stronger vertical variability. In situ gas content varied systematically with lithofacies: CM displayed higher and more concentrated values (maximum 4.78 cm3/g), whereas S was more dispersed, with persistently low values in the continuous S-2 interval (minimum 0.15 cm3/g). Favorable intervals were associated with the continuous development of CM-1 and S-1, whereas S-2 required interval-specific assessment under an overall low-carbonate background.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a818ecb39a600b3ee727https://doi.org/10.3390/min16020203
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper