PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Global Periapical Health Study (GPHS): A Big Data CBCT Analysis of Periapical Pathology Across 54 Countries.

View Full Paper
JMJ. Estêvão MartinsMVMarco A. Versiani

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess and estimate the global prevalence of periapical pathology using standardized CBCT analysis.
  • Cross-sectional multicenter study conducted across 54 countries
  • Assessment of 3,500 roots from pre-existing CBCT scans
  • Recorded data included lesion presence, tooth type, and demographic variables
  • Utilized meta-analysis and logistic regression for data evaluation
  • 58.6% of individuals globally showed periapical pathology
  • 7.3% prevalence at the tooth level, varying regionally
  • Maxillary teeth affected more than mandibular teeth; highest in maxillary first molars (18.6%)
  • Prevalence increased with age, from 2.9% in under 20 to 10.5% in over 60
  • Endodontically treated teeth had a prevalence of 44.3%, significantly higher than untreated teeth (2.6%)

Abstract

Introduction Periapical pathology, a common outcome of pulpal infection or failed endodontic therapy, remains underexplored globally. Most studies are small-scale and based on two-dimensional radiographs. This study aimed to provide a standardized worldwide estimate of its prevalence using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods A cross-sectional, multicenter study was conducted across 54 countries, each represented by one calibrated examiner. Examiners consecutively assessed 3,500 roots from pre-existing CBCT scans, yielding data from 189,000 roots (138,536 teeth) of 6,688 patients. A standardized protocol was applied using the CBCT periapical index to record lesion presence, tooth type, previous root canal treatment, and demographic variables. Only scans with voxel size ≤200 μm were included. Data were analyzed through meta-analysis and logistic regression model to evaluate factors associated with periapical pathology, with meta-regression assessing voxel size and field-of-view effects. Results At the patient level, periapical pathology affected 58.6% of individuals worldwide. Secondary tooth-level analysis showed a prevalence of 7.3%, ranging from 2.5% in Oceania to 9.6% in Africa. Maxillary teeth (9.3%) were more frequently affected than mandibular teeth (5.3%), with maxillary first molars showing the highest prevalence (18.6%). Prevalence increased with age, from 2.9% (≤20 years) to 10.5% (≥61 years). Endodontically treated teeth showed markedly higher prevalence of post-treatment periapical radiolucencies (44.3%) than untreated teeth (2.6%) (OR=21.6; CI 19.1-23.1; P < .001). Voxel size and field-of-view did not influence outcomes. Conclusion Periapical pathology is highly prevalent worldwide, with notable regional and age-related differences. Endodontically treated teeth showed a disproportionately high prevalence of periapical pathology.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Martins et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a818ecb39a600b3ee866https://doi.org/10.48620/94631
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper