PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)0 citationsOpen Access

Economic benefits of WALANT anaesthesia in metacarpal and phalangeal fracture surgery

View Full Paper
BTBenjamin TrautzPMPhilipp MoogISInessa Suhova

Key Result

The WALANT technique significantly reduced operation time and costs versus regional anesthesia in 921 hand fracture surgeries, improving cost-effectiveness despite incomplete reimbursement.

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the economic and clinical benefits of the WALANT technique for hand fracture surgeries.
  • Conducted a single-centre retrospective analysis of 921 hand operations for metacarpal and phalangeal fractures.
  • Compared operation time and costs of WALANT procedures with those under regional anaesthesia.
  • Analyzed reimbursement structures versus procedural costs.
  • WALANT significantly reduced operation time and treatment costs compared to regional anaesthesia.
  • Reimbursement did not fully cover costs for either procedure group.
  • WALANT improved cost-effectiveness despite gaps in reimbursement structure.

Structured PICO

Does the WALANT technique reduce operation time and cost compared to regional anaesthesia in metacarpal and phalangeal fracture surgery?

P
Population
921 metacarpal and phalangeal hand operations for fracture treatment, including both fixation and removal of metalwork
I
Intervention
Wide-awake-local-anaesthesia-no-tourniquet (WALANT) technique
C
Comparator
Regional anaesthesia (RA) with brachial plexus block
O
Outcome
Operation time and cost of procedures

WALANT anesthesia reduces operative time and procedural costs compared to regional anesthesia in hand fracture surgery, improving workflow efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

Abstract

Introduction: The wide-awake-local-anaesthesia-no-tourniquet (WALANT) technique is increasingly used in hand surgery, avoiding general or regional anaesthesia and upper arm tourniquets. Clinical and economic benefits have been shown especially for trigger finger and carpal tunnel release; however, its impact on fracture treatment warrants evaluation. Methods: We conducted a single-centre retrospective analysis of 921 metacarpal and phalangeal hand operations for fracture treatment, including both fixation and removal of metalwork. The operation time and cost of procedures performed under WALANT were compared with those using regional anaesthesia (RA) with brachial plexus block. Reimbursement for the procedures were compared with the cost. Results: The WALANT technique significantly reduced the operation time and treatment cost compared with RA. However, we found that the reimbursement structure did not fully cover the procedural expenses in either group. Despite this, WALANT reduced financial deficits, demonstrating superior cost-effectiveness. Conclusion: In addition to reducing operative time and overall procedural costs, WALANT decreased dependence on anaesthesia capacity, thereby improving the efficiency of surgical workflows. This approach also promotes a more sustainable model of healthcare delivery by minimizing resource consumption and simplifying logistics. Moreover, its cost-effectiveness may enhance the long-term economic feasibility of reimbursement and funding systems within modern healthcare structures. Level of evidence: IV

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Trautz et al. (2026) studied this question. The WALANT technique significantly reduced operation time and costs versus regional anesthesia in 921 hand fracture surgeries, improving cost-effectiveness despite incomplete reimbursement.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a82decb39a600b3ee915https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934251409627
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper