Abstract CONTEXT: Moisturizers are widely used for skin hydration but can provoke allergic contact dermatitis due to various allergenic compounds. The moisturizer formulations – including emollients, humectants, preservatives, fragrances, and botanical extracts – heighten the risk for allergic reactions, especially among vulnerable populations. Regional regulatory differences and varying ingredient profiles further complicate safe product selection and allergy management. AIMS: The aim is to profile the allergenic compounds present in commercial moisturizers available in the Indian market. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Secondary data analysis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The list of moisturizers was compiled from leading Indian e-commerce platforms, including products disclosing full ingredient lists. Allergenic compounds identified from published scientific literature were categorized as high or low-prevalence according to the North American Contact Dermatitis Group survey data. Statistical associations between total ingredient count and allergen presence were examined. RESULTS: Of 1185 products reviewed, 926 met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 96.8% contained at least one known allergen, with some products listing up to 15 allergens. In total, 134 unique allergens were identified (49 high prevalence, 91 low prevalence). Fragrances (35.8%) and perfumes (23.5%) constituted the most frequent high-prevalence allergens, alongside botanical extracts and propylene glycol. A statistically significant positive association was found between ingredient count and allergen number. Many low-prevalence allergens occurred commonly due to their widespread formulation use. CONCLUSIONS: Allergenic compounds are nearly ubiquitous in commercial Indian moisturizers, with both high- and low-prevalence allergens posing risks to consumers. These findings underscore the necessity for greater transparency, regulatory reform, and expanded allergen screening in product formulation and clinical care.
Arunachalam et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: