PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Cerebral Cortex0 citations

Computational constraints underlying shape and texture functional domain organization in macaque V4

View Full Paper
DJDunhan JiangTWTianye WangYBYingjue Bian

Key Points

  • The research aims to explore how shape and texture preferences are organized in macaque V4 and the computational constraints that influence this organization.
  • Constructed digital twins of V4 from a wide-field imaging dataset.
  • Analyzed spatial clustering of shape- and texture-preferring neurons.
  • Compared V4 organization to artificial neural networks trained on ImageNet.
  • Shape- and texture-preferring neurons are spatially clustered into functional domains.
  • V4 exhibits a balanced preference for shape and texture compared to artificial neural networks.
  • Computational constraints of feature similarity and retinotopy are sufficient to explain V4's topological map organization.

Abstract

Abstract V4, an intermediate visual area in the ventral pathway of the primate visual system, is known to contain neurons selective to visual stimulus attributes of intermediate complexity. Recent studies have shown that macaque V4 is organized into neuronal columns, each tuned to specific natural image features, and topologically arranged across the cortical surface to form functionally specialized domains. Using digital twins of V4 constructed from a large-scale wide-field imaging dataset, we demonstrate that shape- and texture-preferring neurons—previously identified in single-unit studies—are spatially clustered into functional domains. The segregated spatial organization suggests the existence of parallel modules for surface and boundary processing. Unlike artificial neural networks trained for ImageNet classification, which exhibit a strong texture bias, we find that V4 cortical columns and functional domains are more evenly balanced between shape and texture preferences. Finally, we show that computational constraints of feature similarity and retinotopy constraints are necessary and sufficient to explain many observed properties of the organization of the V4 topological map of natural image feature preferences.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jiang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a8c7ecb39a600b3efca1https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaf345
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database2009 · 63,239 citations
  2. 2How Does the Brain Solve Visual Object Recognition?2012 · 1,948 citations
  3. 3Shape Representation in Area V4: Position-Specific Tuning for Boundary Conformation2001 · 497 citations
  4. 4Object shape and surface properties are jointly encoded in mid-level ventral visual cortex2019 · 37 citations
  5. 5Receptive field focus of visual area V4 neurons determines responses to illusory surfaces2013 · 71 citations